OG 61 的疑问

tinawg

以下是引用Tiangel在2004-7-30 0:10:00的发言：

对不起，把对60的提问写到这里了，上面的问题取消：p

应该是

E中的their 是不是除了指customers也有可能指banks，那么就歧义了是不是？

也就是说E有三处错误：1only一个check

          2 被动的施动者不明

          3 再加一条是我自己理解的，即歧义，对么？

有道理

心晴

that a bank disclose to its customers how long it will delay access to funds from deposited checks

认为C的it没错，一个是应该指代从句的主语，一个是应该和its指代对象一致，it都做到了。

请NN指正。

cora_jin

想问高手一下OG 61

The Gorton-Dodd bill requires that a bank disclose to their customers how long they will delay access to funds from deposited checks.
(A) that a bank disclose to their customers how long they will delay access to funds from deposited checks
(B) a bank to disclose to their customers how long they will delay access to funds from a deposited check
(C) that a bank disclose to its customers how long it will delay access to funds from deposited checks
(D) a bank that it should disclose to its customers how long it will delay access to funds from a depos-ited check
(E) that banks disclose to customers how long access to funds from their deposited check is to be delayed

什么是delay access to funds from deposited checks.

这整句话到底是什么意思啊？

UScocoon

我试着翻译一下，不对的话表笑

GD bill要求银行透露（银行）有权利耽搁来自抵押支票的资金的时间 给他的顾客

titatita

以下是引用cora_jin在2005-7-15 14:27:00的发言：

想问高手一下OG 61

The Gorton-Dodd bill requires that a bank disclose to their customers how long they will delay access to funds from deposited checks.
(A) that a bank disclose to their customers how long they will delay access to funds from deposited checks
(B) a bank to disclose to their customers how long they will delay access to funds from a deposited check
(C) that a bank disclose to its customers how long it will delay access to funds from deposited checks
(D) a bank that it should disclose to its customers how long it will delay access to funds from a depos-ited check
(E) that banks disclose to customers how long access to funds from their deposited check is to be delayed

什么是delay access to funds from deposited checks.

就是从存款的支票将钱转到基金帐户要延迟多长时间.

这是个金融方面的常识,银行转帐是需要一定的时间,就好象你从本市工行汇款到农行要一天,但从北京工行汇款到广州工行可能要5天.

这整句话到底是什么意思啊？

hyte

以下是引用titatita在2006-1-9 19:24:00的发言：

The Gorton-Dodd法案要求銀行需向其客戶透露銀行客戶的已存支票將會延遲多久才入帳~ 這裡的funds應該是翻成"存款"~而非基金! deposited checks是已存支票

gorgeous621

A中THEY有指代错误吗?THEY不是优先指代主句主语吗?

qwedcxzas

在这题OG说

B, like D and E, illogically shifts from the plural customers and funds to the singular check, as if the customers were jointly deposit­ing only one check.(单复数问题)

可是在
            OV-59

167. Neanderthals had a vocal tract that resembled those of the apes and so were probably without language, a shortcoming that may explain why they were supplanted by our own species.

(A)
                        Neanderthals had a vocal tract that resembled those of the apes

(B)
                        Neanderthals had a vocal tract resembling an ape's

(C)
                        The vocal tracts of Neanderthals resembled an ape's

(D)
                        The Neanderthal's vocal tracts resembled the
                apes’ (B)

(E)  The vocal tracts of the Neanderthals resembled
                those of the apes

以及
            

252. Three out of every four automobile owners in the United States also own a bicycle.

(A) Three out of every four automobile owners in the United States also own a bicycle.

(B) Out of every four, three automobile owners in the United States also owns a bicycle.

(C) Bicycles are owned by three out of every four owners of automobiles in the United States.

(D) In the United States, three out of every four automobile owners owns bicycles. (A)（A）

(E) Out of every four owners of automobiles in the United States, bicycles are also owned by three.

The shift to plural Bicycles detracts from clarity by suggesting that multiple bicycles are

owned by each person in question.

这两题都是拥有者为复数,拥有的东西为单数,也没有造成本题所说的大家共有一个账户的情形发生啊!我明白其它选项各自有错误的地方,但实在无法理解OG对不同的题目有不同的解释,还是说我有理解错误的地方吗?

请大家指点一下

谢谢

goyce36

楼上的问题正是我想问的。今天做到这题，想到252自行车的那题。很多美国人拥有自行车，用单数，OG说因为可以表示每个人都有一辆，防止产生每人有很多辆的歧义。而这里也是复数拥有者单数名词，为何就会产生所有人都把钱存入一个账户的歧义，而不是理解成每人有一个账户？？

lcy19812000

值得高兴的是，og10－252在og11中已经删除了，我想可以说明ets还是认为252这样的表达方法不够严谨。