|
以下是引用CasualWalk在2003-4-6 16:29:00的发言: A major art theft from a museum was remarkable in that the pieces stolen clearly had been carefully selected. The criterion for selection, however, clearly had not been greatest estimated market value. It follows that the theft was specifically carried out to suit the taste of some individual collector for whose private collection the pieces were destined.
The argument tacitly appeals to which one of the following principles? (A) Any art theft can, on the evidence of the selection of pieces stolen, be categorized as committed either at the direction of a single known individual or at the direction of a group of known individuals. (B) Any art theft committed at the direction of a single individual results in a pattern of works taken and works left alone that defies rational analysis. (C) The pattern of works taken and works left alone can sometimes distinguish one type of art theft from another. (D) Art thefts committed with no preexisting plan for the disposition of the stolen works do not always involve theft of the most valuable pieces only. (E) The pattern of works taken and works left alone in an art theft can be particularly damaging to the integrity of the remaining collection.
偶选D,答案为C。想是偶将appeal to的意思弄错了?请指教。
结论:the theft was specifically carried out to suit the taste of some individual collector for whose private collection the pieces were destined.即:贼是冲着某一主题来的。 做出这一结论的唯一解释(原则、原因)是:人们可以用被偷的东西来判断贼的目的。
D直接猜测贼的情形,离题太far away。 |