ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1917|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

麻烦nn看一下 以前没说清楚 og168

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-31 21:01:00 | 只看该作者

麻烦nn看一下 以前没说清楚 og168

168. Today, because of improvements in agricultural technology, the same amount of acreage produces double the apples that it has in 1910.

(A)  double the apples that it has

(B)  twice as many apples as it did

(C)  as much as twice the apples it has

(D)  two times as many apples as there were

(E)   a doubling of the apples that it did

Choice B, the best answer, correctly uses the adverbial phrase twice as many... to modify the verb produces; properly employs many rather than much to describe a quantity made up of countable units (apples); and appropriately substitutes did for the understood produced to express the logically necessary past tense of produces. Choice A awkwardly substitutes the adjective double for twice;
                uses that without a clear referent; and misuses has to refer to events occurring in 1910. Choice C employs the incorrect much in a wordy construction and also misuses has. D is wordy and imprecise;... as there were in 1910 refers to all apples produced in 1910, regardless of location. E is illogical: since that refers to a doubling, E nonsensically asserts that the doubling occurred in 1910.

A项中的that可以指代apples it指代acreage  不是挺好吗.为什么说 uses that without a clear referent  虚心请教nn 谢谢

沙发
发表于 2006-7-31 21:18:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得讨论连接中书得挺清楚的,不是LZ的问题在哪里。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-2 19:40:00 | 只看该作者

carolhide 谢谢了

1910年的苹果和现在的苹果不是同样的一批苹果,句子要表达的是数量上的是两倍的概念。a选项首先apples作为produce的宾语,说明这个apples是现在的apples。但是用that来作为定语从句中的宾语来指代的话,则是指的是1910年的apples,是不是矛盾呢!类似的问题OG中还出现过,一时想不起来是哪道题了,留意的话你应该会看到的。

说的有道理,OG里面我记得的确有类似的问题. 可以提醒一下楼主,就是那道"东海岸和西海岸的地震"那个题(题号我记不清了)

另外, "the apples that it has in 1910" 如果此处that修饰apple的话, 宾语从句的先行词that应该省略. (根据简洁性原则能省则省)

地板
发表于 2006-8-13 18:02:00 | 只看该作者
是不是搞错了???
完完全全相同的东西采用it/THOSE,地震用的是it,可见灯能源用的都是it错的
不同时间的东西用that/THOSE
继续顶一下,当初石头大哥没讲明白啊

    

168.
Today, because of improvements in agricultural technology, the same amount of
acreage produces double the apples that it has in 1910.


    

(A) 
double the apples that it has


    

(B) 
twice as many apples as it did


    

(C) 
as much as twice the apples it has


    

(D)  two
times as many apples as there were


    

(E)   a
doubling of the apples that it did


    Choice A awkwardly substitutes the adjective double for twice; uses that without a clear referent;



    

E is illogical: since that
refers to a doubling, E nonsensically
asserts that the doubling occurred in 1910 (
语感).

为什么就不能不指代 doubling???



    
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 08:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部