ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1047|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急茬!脑袋快炸了 在线等!!OG109 谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-19 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

急茬!脑袋快炸了 在线等!!OG109 谢谢!

109. Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills

OG109中,A选项为什么加上that are 就不歧义了?是因为skill是单数吗?还是有什么别的规则?我基础不好 见笑了!

对于这种产生歧义的问题,我看了很多讨论好像还是主要看意思和单复数形式判断是吗?

那么在104题中

114. From the bark of the paper birch tree the Menomini crafted a canoe about twenty feet long and two feet wide, with small ribs and rails of cedar, which could carry four persons or eight hundred pounds baggage so light that that a person could easily portage it around impeding rapids.

A. baggage so light

B. baggage being so light

C. baggage, yet being so light

D. baggage, and so light

E. baggage yet was so light

E选项是怎么通过加上WAS 就驱逐歧义了呢? HELP ME!

沙发
发表于 2006-7-19 21:41:00 | 只看该作者

NN们几乎都淡出论坛了.此乃你我之遗憾塞.

这两题我也都标注了要注意的.正在最后一遍过OG.

109原来我也疑惑,但是疑惑也没用,只是这样记住就好了,A如果是is那一定是修饰skill的.如果是are,就没歧义了.

114你的问题我觉得OG解释都说得挺明白的.我对这题觉得麻烦是它的with独立主格,which的非限定修饰.都放在一起,就去修饰离那么老远的canoe......which修饰真是挺烦的.

板凳
发表于 2006-7-19 22:38:00 | 只看该作者

很多时候比较少人回答OG的问题,因为大部分东西以前已经被讨论透了. 请支持,提问前自己作一下搜索以免太多重复答问帖造成后人查询困难.  

OG109 是因为过去分辞修饰最近名辞但这里并不是要修饰skill 所以要用that. 虽然 that 也是就近修饰但是也可以修饰名词从句/短语. 而这个are 是有起到作用. 所以修饰 jobs requiring....   关于that 修饰名词从句/短语请参考:OG 152 & 128

 OG114 是因为 so light 需要修饰canoe 而不是 baggage. 所以要加连辞"yet"和be 动词把他和前面并列以免修饰到baggage

这边with 引出的不是独立主格而是介系词引出的插入语. 所以wich 可以跳过修饰.

希望有帮到你


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-19 22:43:45编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-20 12:39:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢你们 还有sen4sun这样的NN啊 解释的真清楚

winnowerfly,快考了吧,你也很厉害!加油哈

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 13:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部