ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joanna143
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd26-11

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2007-2-17 07:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cavinmontrea在2006-12-3 13:42:00的发言:
The reasons .... were the same as those (reasons) that were ...

The sentence is an abbreviated form by leaving "that were" out.

请问不是those+n才能表示指代么,为什么这里可以省去reasons只用those呢?

用that哪里错了?

谢谢

12#
发表于 2007-5-18 16:29:00 | 只看该作者
ding
13#
发表于 2007-5-18 16:48:00 | 只看该作者
those就是指代reasons啊
14#
发表于 2007-6-18 14:44:00 | 只看该作者

B. those refers to reasons.

E. they has no reference

15#
发表于 2007-7-16 23:29:00 | 只看该作者

Here is my idea why i did not choose A in the beginning. In GMAT, most of time "that" has to directly refer to the nouns in front of it. However, there is no noun in front of "that" and thus "that" here will not refer to "reasons."

Sure, there are examples such as "reasons of.... and that of..." in OG, but the "that" is close enough and parrellel enough and will never follow the first idea after so many words. 

16#
发表于 2009-3-1 13:43:00 | 只看该作者

but the second half, i can not find a verb: a surge in the economy to a 5.6 percent annual growth rate and improved corporate earnings balanced by the lack of signs of inflationary pressure.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-1 13:49:47编辑过]
17#
发表于 2009-7-30 10:51:00 | 只看该作者

看看

18#
发表于 2009-10-25 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

题目比较的是两个 reason 的内容,因此不用补出谓语

此外,they 指代的是上面出现过的“同一个reason”,逻辑上变成同一个reason的内容在比较,不妥。这种指代的逻辑错误跟 大全168 的一样。

因此应该用 those 指代前面的 reasons 这个名词

19#
发表于 2010-8-8 13:56:46 | 只看该作者
题目比较的是两个 reason 的内容,因此不用补出谓语
此外,they 指代的是上面出现过的“同一个reason”,逻辑上变成同一个reason的内容在比较,不妥。这种指代的逻辑错误跟 大全168 的一样。
因此应该用 those 指代前面的 reasons 这个名词
-- by 会员 mars_cheung (2009/10/25 17:05:00)



这个说的对!顶!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 12:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部