ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (MCWL)

00:00:00

One legacy of Madison Avenue's recent campaign to appeal to people fifty years old and over is the realization that as a person ages, their concerns change as well.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2962|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于平行 大全554 对比大全556

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-23 23:06:00 | 只看该作者

关于平行 大全554 对比大全556

大全554  og084  One legacy of Madison Avenue’s recent campaign to appeal to people fifty years old and over is the realization that as a person ages, their concerns change as well.

(A) the realization that as a person ages, their

(B) the realization that as people age, their

(C) to realize that when a person ages, his or her

(D) to realize that when people age, theirB

(E) realizing that as people age, their

In choice A, the plural pronoun their does not agree in number with the singular noun person. Choices C, D, and E can be faulted for failing to complete the construction One legacy... is with a noun that matches the noun legacy; these choices use verb forms—the infinitive to realize or the present participle realizing—in place of a noun such as realization. Further, when in C and D is less precise than as in characterizing a prolonged and gradual process such as aging. B is the best answer.

大全556  
                                        
One of Arthur Jessop’s first acts as president of the FHA was to deny a request from the private sector that federal home loan programs should be expanded to cover houses not conforming to civil construction codes.

(A) should be expanded to cover houses not conforming to

(B) be expanded to cover houses not conforming to

(C) should be expand to cover houses not conforming with

(D) would have been expanded to cover houses not conforming toB

(E) had to be expanded to cover houses not conforming with

既然554中OG的解释是N  is N才平行, 那么大全556提干中的用法是特殊情况吗?虽然act as 有动作含义.

help!

沙发
发表于 2006-6-24 01:15:00 | 只看该作者

还是看逻辑意思的把,act可以跟目的性的to do,好像遗产没什么好目的性的把,而且legacy to realize???不合常理啊

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-24 01:53:00 | 只看该作者

to realize ...不可以作表语当作是legacy的一个方面吗?

这样表达就一定表示是legacy本身去realize吗?

地板
发表于 2006-7-28 22:43:00 | 只看该作者

顶一下554这个题

讨论一下意思


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-28 23:03:56编辑过]
5#
发表于 2006-9-22 08:11:00 | 只看该作者

一个是强调的动作,一个是强调的结果.

so i now think that it is very important to understand the meanings of sentences ~~~ 

6#
发表于 2008-10-3 08:12:00 | 只看该作者

会不会是因为legacy是物质性名词,所以不能跟be to do的形式;而act是动作性名词,所以可以跟be to do形式。

没有把握,大家讨论讨论。

7#
发表于 2008-10-3 16:21:00 | 只看该作者

en,会不会是第一个是n. is n.

表示什么是什么

而第二个是表示目的的。

8#
发表于 2009-5-13 01:52:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
发表于 2010-7-3 20:53:11 | 只看该作者
我的理解是,主语one legacy无法做to realize和realizing的动作发出者,逻辑不通
所以只能对应the realization
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-20 03:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部