161. A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles. (A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than (B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than (C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than (D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than(D) (E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than D, the best choice, uses a correct sequence of present and future indicative verb forms—predicts, will fail, and is—in the three related clauses. Density, an abstract “mass” noun, is logically construed with greater than. In A and B, would fail disagrees with the other verbs in tense and mood. Choice A misconstrues density with more numerous than, and B uses the pretentious and illogical word provided for if in a conditional clause after a negative idea (would fail). C’s should fail and was are confusing and inconsistent with predicts. C and E use the absurd phrase timber wolf density. (The wolves are not dense; their population is dense.) E also uses an inconsistent subjunctive form, were, and misconstrues density with more numerous than. 很多朋友在讨论provided and if,而我还没有学到这里。我的疑问是主句中使用了predict that的宾语从句。所以我想问的问题是: 1,像predict,anticipate等对未来预测的词语,后面的从句中使用什么时态? 2,在这个句子中if引导的是一个条件状语从句(因为都是假设,应该是适用虚拟语气的语法)。我查了语法书,书中说条件从句的谓语要使用相当于过去时的形式,而主句谓语要使用would + 动词原形。这不是和正确答案相矛盾吗? 请大家给予解答。感谢万分。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-23 12:15:52编辑过] |