ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2949|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

a question!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-29 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

a question!

The nation’s three military academies have seen a dramatic rise in applications, (one fueled by a resurgence of patriotism, increasing tuition costs at private colleges, and improved recruiting by the academies.)
A. one fueled by a resurgence of patriotism, increasing tuition costs at private colleges, and improved recruiting by the academies.

B. one fueled by a resurgence of patriotism, tuition costs that have increased at private colleges, and academies improving their recruiting

C. one fueled by a resurgence of patriotism, private colleges that increased their tuition costs, and recruiting improvements by the academies

D. fueled by a resurgence of patriotism, tuition costs increasing at private colleges, and academies improving their recruiting

E. fueled by a resurgence of patriotism, increasing tuition costs at private colleges, and academies improving their recruiting

why the answer is (A)?

“one” is for “dramatic rise”? but then “increasing tuition costs” and “improved recruiting” are parallel with who?

Thank you!
沙发
发表于 2003-9-29 10:59:00 | 只看该作者
one fueled by | a resurgence of patriotism, increasing tuition costs at private colleges, and improved recruiting by the academies.|

就是这三个东西的并列。其他选项都不符合并列的原则。





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-29 11:00:47编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2003-9-29 11:43:00 | 只看该作者
Firmly support Bravemba
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-29 19:39:00 | 只看该作者

thank you but one more question

Thank you!

one more question is here... Once the economic and social usefulness of the motor car was demonstrated (and with its superiority to the horse being proved), much of the early hostility to it in rural regions disappeared.

A.and with its superiority to the horse being proved
B.and its superiority over the horse had been proved
C.and its superiority to the horse proved
D.its superiority to the horse proved
E.with its superiority to the horse having been proved

answer is C

but why before "proved", there's no "be" or "that"? whereas the first half sentence, before "demonstrated", "was" is there...






5#
发表于 2003-9-29 22:50:00 | 只看该作者
proved前面省略了WAS,因为它与它前面的并列句的相同。
而第一个就不能省啦。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-30 01:09:00 | 只看该作者

原创 6月27日机经

thanks a lot!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 01:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部