ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1147|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

刘振民精解VS OG!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-4 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

刘振民精解VS OG!

新OG 第9题,同大全677


刘振民精解选C,OG选A


请牛人解惑


谢谢


沙发
发表于 2006-4-13 00:34:00 | 只看该作者
以OG为准!
板凳
发表于 2006-4-13 18:14:00 | 只看该作者

能把题目传上来看看吗?

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-13 21:45:00 | 只看该作者

好的 没问题 我看了刘的解释觉得挺有道理 能帮我分析下OG的吗 实在不觉得对呵呵


9. Sunspots, vortices of gas associated with strong electromagnetic activity, are visible as dark spots on surface of the Sun but have never been sighted on the Sun's poles or equator.


(A) are visible as dark spots on the surface of the Sun but have never been sighted on


(B) are visible as dark spots that never have been sighted on the surface of the Sun


(C) appear on the surface of the Sun as darkspots although never sighted at        A


(D) appear as dark spots on the surface of the Sun, although never having been sighted at


(E) appear as dark spots on the Sun's surface, which have never been sighted on



同大全677



The correct parallel structure in the original sentence emphasizes the contrast between where sunspots are found (are visible...Sun) and where they are not (have ever beensighted...equator). Sunsports is the subject of the sentence, are is the verb of the first part of the contrast and have been sighted is the verb of the the second. The adjective visible is a complement and is a parallel to the past participle sighted. Both parts of the sentence conclude with phrases indicating location.The contrast itself is indicated by the conjunction but.



A.correct. This sentence clearly and correctly draws a contrast between where sunspots are found and where they are not


B.Changing the modifying clause so that that never...Sun distorts the meaning of the sentence; the contrast is lost


C.Although typically introduces a subordinate clause, which has a subject and a verb, but here there is no subject and sighted is not a complete verb


D.Although usually introduce a subordinate clause, but there is no subject of the clause and having been sighted is not a complete verb phrase


E.The relative pronoun which should immediately follow its referent; here which illogically follows surface, and its intended referent, either sunspots or dark spots, becomes unclear


5#
发表于 2006-4-13 22:15:00 | 只看该作者

具体问题呢?


建议下研究OG吧,造成这样先入为主的印象就不太好。

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-13 23:25:00 | 只看该作者
说ON指面,AT只点 POLE是个点 应该用AT
7#
发表于 2006-4-14 10:24:00 | 只看该作者

有时候这样的说法并不绝对的,有些是固定搭配就不遵循这个规则。介词搭配问题是挺头痛的,我做题时一般尽量找其他考点选答案。


所以不要一味信仰法则,XDF的某些黄金法则还是争议颇多的。

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-14 22:37:00 | 只看该作者

那能给我讲讲A为什么对吗 这个题我不太懂,不知考的那个点


谢谢

9#
发表于 2006-4-15 08:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用紫衣女孩在2006-4-14 22:37:00的发言:

那能给我讲讲A为什么对吗 这个题我不太懂,不知考的那个点


谢谢


MM要习惯看OG的解释,这题OG已经把考点都罗列了。建议MM去下OG菜鸟手册,所有考点NN都总结出来了,是非常不错的东西。

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-15 10:43:00 | 只看该作者

好的好的


谢谢斑竹提示

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 22:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部