人在深圳，读哪个在职MBA为好？

張6常

以下是引用crickets在2006-9-12 17:08:00的发言：

感谢張6常这么热心介绍HKUST SZ MBA,但我觉得你的介绍跟实际有点出入,请参考 http://www.bm.ust.hk/szmba/

請指點

qwertas

网页看了，倒没觉得张6常介绍的和网页所述有什么分别。。只不过费用和证书固然重要，另一方面不知道实际所学以及课业质量会不会有大的负担？

kevinzzj

Lecturers are the same as HKG full time student. Some of them are even the really world class professors of Kellogg-HKUST EMBA which cost you US$80,000.....hence it is very worthwhile deal in SZ(US$20,000).

qwertas

哦，谢了。刚发现自己用词不当，本想问不知道实际所学以及课业质量会不会有大的分别。。怎么说呢，比如我上司当初读中大在职MBA就特别选取周末模式，因为觉得这种模式似乎更适合真想学东西的学生。早听闻科大MBA课业负担挺重的，不知道深港两边学习的氛围是不是能差不多。。

kevinzzj

one sentence conclusion: even the examination content is same as the full time in HKG. 40% roughly courses are required closed book and notes.No Cheating!!! You could image the quality criteria is strict request by school. Anyway once per week is much better than once per month module...easy for you to preview and digest the essence of every subject. Most of HKG students are more hardwork and commitment than mainland student. Believe or not! If you really want to be the qualified executive in first class MNC rather than State-owned and local provite enterprises. HKUST is fit.  

qwertas

Thanks Kevin, that's what I want.

天道不孤

如果从官方主页上来看深圳班的15万RMB应该是在扣除奖学金后的金额，而香港班的21.6万HKD是扣除奖学金前的金额，如扣除后应该与15万RMB差不多(据本论坛一美女前辈所言每位大陆学生约有6.6万HKD的奖学金)，不知是否与具体情况相符合，望牛人解疑。

shrekwind

科大深圳班的文凭国家不承认，这是最大的区别。请各位三思后再作决定。

Red_Maple

人在深圳跑去香港上MBA班会非常辛苦,我有朋友曾经这样试过,结果很快就吃不消了.

对于HKUST在深圳PT班,我也赞一个. 国内的PT MBA项目跟本没得比的.

allfar

近啊.HKUST和深圳比较近啊.近是个优势啊.