AA86 是不是题目过于简单？如果没得可写怎么办？

FionaLiang

86. The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a daily newspaper.

“Company A has a large share of the international market in video-game hardware and software. Company B, the pioneer in these products, was once a $12 billion-a-year giant but collapsed when children became bored with its line of products. Thus Company A can also be expected to fail, especially given the fact that its games are now in so many American homes that the demand for them is nearly exhausted.”

我看了范文，也只归纳出两个问题：

1.similities are insufficient to support the conclusion

2.there might be relevant differences

这两点其实就是一回事，对吗？

是这个题目的内容过于简单了，还是我没找到问题的所在？？？

如果考试中遇到这种题目，没得可写该怎么办？？？

请NN指点，谢谢！

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-6 9:23:14编辑过]

FionaLiang

拜托指教啊！

FionaLiang

怎么还是没人理我？555555~

入画

1。他因导致B倒闭

2。错误类比

3. so many 是多少，作者没给出具体数值

4。A公司是国际公司，国内市场饱和不代表要完蛋了。

xjlv128

1 false analogy

2 oversimplification: the popularity is not the direct reason of failure.

对于这道题，我的理解是——大的错误就是我列出的两个。小的还可以找很多，比如入画说的。但都可以归到大类里面。至于范文，我同意lz看法，他只不过是把类比错误拆开了讲。

继续讨论讨论……

sacrati

除了上述的几点。还可以提提例如A公司也会不断研发新产品，以满足新市场等的可能性，所以不会倒闭！

挑几个重要的错误展开阐述，觉得应该就会不错了！个人觉得不一定要每一个点咬文嚼字一样地抓出来，特别是那些很小的点！

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-7 10:40:36编辑过]

FionaLiang

谢谢，谢谢！茅塞顿开！