[求助]GWD-30-17 新手上路

lxzjojo

up

lxzjojo

以下是引用zxz1818在2006-11-10 1:55:00的发言：

A. used for, incorrect

B. 介词短语 + so that, incorrect

D. which 职代句字, incorrect

E. that 职代plants, plants make them (plants), incorrect

C. used to 作定于, 修饰techniques, employing 作伴随状语, 修饰researchers, 并无重复. 只有they 可能歧义, 指向techniques, 但所有choices 都用they or them. correct

做题的时候想了4、5分钟怕有了，就是一直觉得没有一个是最好的。。。C中的they有歧义。。。现在看了这位GG的见解，觉得很有道理呐，其实每一个选项都有they或者them，都可能有歧义，所以就不作为排除的理由啦！谢谢~~

sigrid920

但是偶觉得(C)中的 the same ....so that的用法不太好啊, 而(E)其实也不能算修饰错误如果我们把(E)看成是 the same techniques (for ...) that ...

如果这样(E)不是成好吗?

lxzjojo

丽香MM，你理解的很对，这里的that逻辑上应该是修饰techniques的没错，问题是that修饰的限定性定语从句总是紧跟在修饰词后面，而且因为techniques和plants都是复数，偶们凭that后面的谓语动词又无法判断到底that修饰滴系谁，会产生歧义，这是E的硬伤。

C其实也不是最好，但偶觉得C的错不是致命错误啦，算是矮子里算高个呗~~

sabrina07

up

chang2301

In my opinion

the answer should not be C

because "employing" and "used" are definitely redundancy

moreover,"they" in C will not refer to "plants" since "plants" is objective while "they" is subjective

So, I would rather believe that the question has some errors

which sould be to modify the "makes" into "make" in D

or modify "that" into "which" in E

Open to discuss!

jamesyeah

以下是引用chang2301在2007-1-16 13:57:00的发言：

In my opinion

the answer should not be C

because "employing" and "used" are definitely redundancy

moreover,"they" in C will not refer to "plants" since "plants" is objective while "they" is subjective

So, I would rather believe that the question has some errors

which sould be to modify the "makes" into "make" in D

or modify "that" into "which" in E

Open to discuss!

支持！

同时我认为A应该是正确选项，起码没有逻辑和语法错误阿。

楼上有人说A  by 和making 的逻辑主语，很清楚，在这两个短语置首的情况下，逻辑主语就是researchers。

Used for 是没有used to 好，但也不至于是一个语法错误阿。

llxx1985cn

up

风临左岸

如果used for没有错的话，支持A呀，making 不觉的有什么错，没有要求现在分词的逻辑主语必须是紧接着前面的名词；可以是修饰前面的整个句子，也就是by后面的整个内容。

C中so that实在是很奇怪，在一个现在分词中出现一个目的状语从句感觉怪怪的

chamcham

thx, still not sure next time I can pick up C over B