[讨论]OG11－049

hohoo

意思就是现在很多房屋供应商提供了一种“从租到买”的服务，让那些没有能力用常规支付手段进行按揭的人们可以（以租赁形式）先入住以后用房租中间的一部分作为以后购买的支出。

举个例子，我看上上海陆家嘴那套房子了，但我买不起，连首期都给不起。这个时候这帮无耻的开发商也死活不肯降价，但是他们看中了我想买的心理，就想出个主意，说：老弟啊，这样吧，你先住进来，目前就算租，租金3500/Month，然后其中1000作为你买这个房子的首期。这样房子就是你的了。（其实产权还是他的，直到我把全部房贷搞定。）

myvimy

hohoo说的还是挺清楚的,那个叫什么的光屁股的斑竹,og里面并没说改变了重心了,你这个理论是哪里来的?

jellysun

         49. Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that
   enable a family with insufficient savings for a
  conventional down payment to be able to move into new
  housing and to apply
  part of the rent to a purchase later.

(A)            programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply

(B)            programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply

(C)           programs; that enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, to apply

(D)           programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down
   payment to move into new housing, applying

(E)            programs, which enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing, applying

Rhetorical construction

In a lengthy sentence consisting of many phrases, it is essential to determine which phrases and words are necessary to the sentence and which words may be eliminated because they are unnecessary The relative pronoun that correctly refers to programs and introduces the subordinate clause; family is followed by two phrases that are clear and correct. To be able to move, however, is needlessly wordy, repeating the meaning of enable, and can be reduced to to move. This creates a parallel construction in which programs ... enable a family ... to move ... and to apply.

A          To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move

B          Correct. In this sentence, eliminating the wordy construction to be able allows to move to be parallel to to apply.

C          Using a semicolon here causes that to refer too broadly to the entire previous clause rather than specifically to programs; the two infinitives should be joined by the conjunction and, not separated by a comma.

D          The restrictive clause following programs defines programs and must be followed by that, which incorrectly introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off in a pair of commas, containing relevant but not critical information; enables does not agree with the plural subject

E          That introduces a restrictive clause that defines programs; which introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off by a pair of commas, that may be dropped from the sentence; that is required here because the clause defines programs

这句的意思是说,that可以用来指代整个句子了?

我怎么一直记得,that是用来指代同种但不同一个的名词,而且记得that做主语基本就是错,还记得that指代时需要加限制成分

好象从来没有见过that指代整句话的题.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-8 17:54:04编辑过]

jellysun

以下是引用myvimy在2007-3-27 13:23:00的发言：
hohoo说的还是挺清楚的,那个叫什么的光屁股的斑竹,og里面并没说改变了重心了,你这个理论是哪里来的?

这个就是对句子的逻辑意思的把握啊

把应该平行的变成一主一次了

Arabesque

还有D选项的解释中

which incorrectly introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off in a pair of commas, containing relevant but not critical information

怎么理解呢 谢谢!

LaSolitude

提个新问题:

(A)            programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply

OG解释说:A          To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move

那怎么样to apply 就和 to move 平行了呢?

请NN解答!

LaSolitude

怎么没人回哩？顶啊顶啊！

LaSolitude

再顶个！想了一下，还是不明白！

yichousun

以下是引用myvimy在2007-3-27 13:23:00的发言：
hohoo说的还是挺清楚的,那个叫什么的光屁股的斑竹,og里面并没说改变了重心了,你这个理论是哪里来的?

从白勇哪里来的！

yichousun

以下是引用LaSolitude在2007-7-6 10:47:00的发言：

提个新问题:

(A)            programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply

OG解释说:A          To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move

那怎么样to apply 就和 to move 平行了呢?

请NN解答!

如果是A，那么to apply就和to be able平行，在逻辑上是说不通的。所以要去掉to be able 。但我有一个新问题，既然是平行，为什么to apply的to不省略啊？