ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: shouyang12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

如果同时被duke,michigan和darden录取,该选哪个?

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-12-27 16:42:00 | 只看该作者

Maybe you should think about reputation of the university. IMHO Duke is better.

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-27 16:48:00 | 只看该作者

热闹


欢迎发言,投票!



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-27 16:48:29编辑过]
13#
发表于 2005-12-27 16:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用shouyang12在2005-12-27 16:48:00的发言:

热闹


欢迎发言,投票!





~~~~~~~~~~ 敲起鼓儿,打起锣来,看那shouyang刀剑来舞啦。



(怎么感觉开场唱大戏了?嗬嗬)

14#
发表于 2005-12-27 18:35:00 | 只看该作者

DUKE遥遥领先啊。。


我咋一直觉得DARDEN和DUKE差不多呢。。

15#
发表于 2005-12-27 19:38:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wingback在2005-12-27 16:16:00的发言:



发言犀利当然要学习,但小心别像某些同学一样,试还没考呢就嚷嚷着别人的essay烂,进不了wharton之类的预言。把自己说的话咽下去可不是好玩的


C版发言一贯犀利,我早就被犀利的不行了,痛ing。。。。。。。。。。。。。

16#
发表于 2005-12-27 19:42:00 | 只看该作者
感觉如果纯粹从MBA角度而言,三个学校还真差不多,darden是case教学的。如果说到大学,Michigan和Duke应该比Virginia强吧。如果我,也许会选择Duke。
17#
发表于 2005-12-27 19:53:00 | 只看该作者
奇怪,为什么是DUKE排第一呢?UM好像比DUKE好那么一点点吧?就算差不多,DUKE的location好像也不太好吧。
18#
发表于 2005-12-27 19:57:00 | 只看该作者
三个学校的location都不怎么样。如果看Ranking,michigan无疑是最高的,无论是US News还是Business Week。
19#
发表于 2005-12-27 23:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用nautic在2005-12-27 16:32:00的发言:
居然有人收到duke,michigan和darden,愿意选择去darden的

it really depends on your career interest. you won't go wrong at any of these three.


Duke: Marketing and Health Care; Duke U's ranking is much better than that of U. of Michigan and U. of Virginia - but remember that it is the ranking of undergraduate.


Michigan: Operation Management while it is strong across all the business disciplines. -- I also agree that Michigan Ross has a slightly better ranking.


Darden: General Management. -- you might argue that Duke and Michigan also top the ranking of General Management. but please look at their curriculums deeply and also consider Darden's case method.


If you want to do IBD jobs, Michigan and Darden are much better than Duke. For consulting jobs, these three are at the same level.


Darden might be the top 15 school that Chinese undervalue most. Frankly speaking, Darden's placement of Chinese ppl is excellent compared with its peer schools. Reasons: 1) case method improves Chinese ppl's English ability significantly;2) smaller class size (300 vs. 400-500 at Duke and Michigan), less competition; 3) fewer mainland Chinese (7-8 vs. 20-30 at Duke and Michigan), less competition.


Just my two cents.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-27 23:38:46编辑过]
20#
发表于 2005-12-27 23:58:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用FortheCountry在2005-12-27 23:29:00的发言:


it really depends on your career interest. you won't go wrong at any of these three.


Duke: Marketing and Health Care; Duke U's ranking is much better than that of U. of Michigan and U. of Virginia - but remember that it is the ranking of undergraduate.


Michigan: Operation Management while it is strong across all the business disciplines. -- I also agree that Michigan Ross has a slightly better ranking.


Darden: General Management. -- you might argue that Duke and Michigan also top the ranking of General Management. but please look at their curriculums deeply and also consider Darden's case method.


If you want to do IBD jobs, Michigan and Darden are much better than Duke. For consulting jobs, these three are at the same level.


Darden might be the top 15 school that Chinese undervalue most. Frankly speaking, Darden's placement of Chinese ppl is excellent compared with its peer schools. Reasons: 1) case method improves Chinese ppl's English ability significantly;2) smaller class size (300 vs. 400-500 at Duke and Michigan), less competition; 3) fewer mainland Chinese (7-8 vs. 20-30 at Duke and Michigan), less competition.


Just my two cents.



大牛潜水多日,终于大大发言了,嘿嘿。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

NTU MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-7 11:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部