ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2886|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og 138, 谢谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-10 14:49:00 | 只看该作者

og 138, 谢谢

138. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.
(A)    that employers should retain all older workers
(B)    that all older workers be retained by employers
(C)    the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D)    employers' retention of all older workers
(E)    employers to retain all older workers
In English, the idiom is requiring x to y or requiring that x y, with x as the noun subject and y the unconjugated form of the verb.

用的是虚拟吗?


142. In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of marketing, the Coca-Cola company in July 1985 yielded to thousands of irate consumers demanding that it should bring back the original Coke formula.
(A)    demanding that it should
(B)    demanding it to
(C)    and their demand to
(D)    who demanded that it
(E)    who demanded it to
og "E use the ungrammatical expression demanding/demanded it to. "

demand不能用demand x to y?

不明白了。 谁帮我解释解释? 谢谢

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-10 14:55:41编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2003-9-10 15:05:00 | 只看该作者
138
require 可是是虚拟也可以用require to do
如果用虚拟,则应该是 that employers  retain all older workers
这里用了被动
而且直接用employers to retain all older workers简洁些

143  用的是虚拟
demand that +do
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-10 15:33:00 | 只看该作者
也就是说138中的 require x to y 不是虚拟, 对吗?不然为什么不能用demand x to y in 142. 虚拟只用demand that ...do,对吗? 还是不懂142的E, 不管虚拟不虚拟,不能用 demand x to y?

谢谢
地板
发表于 2003-9-10 15:42:00 | 只看该作者
to do 是动词不定式,当然不是虚拟拉

虚拟语气有很多种分类,比如表示愿望的,宁愿~~~不怎么~~~~~~~
表和过去的相反的状态等

这些在ETS的语法里不太考
我们这里考的虚拟便是;
当一些表示:愿望,建议,命令,请求的动词时
其后面的宾语从句用虚拟语气

如:order,demand,propose,command,request,desire,insist,recommend,require,urge等
5#
发表于 2003-9-10 15:45:00 | 只看该作者
至于demand
我好象没见过这样用的

常见的用法便是:demand sth
或者是:sb is demanded to do sth
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-11 00:23:00 | 只看该作者
查了一下, 没有demand x to y. demand: to ask for urgently or peremptorily.

记住了, 谢谢
7#
发表于 2004-3-15 15:06:00 | 只看该作者
请问138题
为了保持平等结构,我觉得答案应该是
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring employers to retain all older workers indefinitely or     (to) show just cause for dismissal.


这里or后面不加to可以吗?

8#
发表于 2004-5-4 05:58:00 | 只看该作者
Of course, we don't  need to in here, like OG said.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-16 09:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部