- UID
- 1858
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-4-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
og 43
43. In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimagin-able place that was considered the end of the world. (A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes (B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes (C) it was the antipodes that was Australia (D) Australia was what was the antipodes (E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes Choice A is best, for A alone makes clear that the land now known as Australia was considered the antipodes before it was developed. In B, it has no logical referent, because the previous clause describes a time when there was no Australia. Nor does it have a referent in C: substituting Australia for it produces a nonsensical statement. D is wordy, with the unnecessary what was, and imprecise in suggesting that Australia was considered the antipodes after it became Australia. E similarly distorts the original meaning, and the past perfect had been is inconsistent with the past tense used to establish a time frame for the rest of the sentence. Explanation 的最后一句话说是太不对,可是我觉得讲的通啊:澳大利亚就是以前被称为antipodes 的地方,一个用过去时,一个用过去完成时没错啊,我倒是对antipode 为plural有异议。
|
|