查看: 5165|回复: 29

[排名] 2021金融时报全球MBA排名 (Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2021)

[精华] [复制链接]
发表于 2021-2-8 11:19:49 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

2021 年 2 月 8 日,英国《金融时报》(Financial Times,以下简称“FT”)发布了 2021 年全球 MBA 百强排行榜。

INSEAD 登顶、LBS 紧随其后,Chicago Booth 季军。IESE 与 Yale 并列第四。


此外,因为新冠疫情影响,有一些学校并没有参评,或调查问卷收集数量没有达到参评要求。因此,这些学校最终没有出现在排名列表,显得略微有些遗憾。一贯比较靠前的有:Harvard、Stanford GSB、UPenn Wharton、MIT Sloan、Columbia、Berkeley Haas。

好了,即刻为大家揭晓今年略带遗憾的排名结果。附件中的 PDF 包含了排名各项指标的得分。

更详细的排名各项指标的得分,请下载附件 PDF:

3 Yr
School Name Country
1 4 3 Insead Fr / SG
2 7 5 London Business School UK
3 10 7 University of Chicago: Booth US
4 13 10 Iese Business School Spain
4 14 10 Yale School of Management US
6 11 10 Northwestern University: Kellogg US
7 5 6 Ceibs China
7 9 12 HEC Paris France
9 16 15 Duke University: Fuqua US
10 16 14 Dartmouth College: Tuck US
11 18 17 University of Virginia: Darden US
12 29 24 SDA Bocconi School of Management Italy
13 22 20 New York University: Stern US
14 15 15 National University of Singapore Business School Singapore
15 23 22 Cornell University: Johnson US
16 19 17 University of Cambridge: Judge UK
17 21 17 University of Oxford: Saïd UK
17 31 26 Georgetown University: McDonough US
19 25 22 IMD Business School Switzerland
20 24 22 Esade Business School Spain
21 30 26 University of Michigan: Ross US
22 19 20 HKUST Business School China
23 28 25 Indian School of Business India
24 36 35 University of Southern California: Marshall US
25 44 41 Washington University: Olin US
26 39 39 University of North Carolina: Kenan-Flagler US
27 31 31 Carnegie Mellon: Tepper US
28 47 41 University of Washington: Foster US
29 56 42 HKU Business School China
30 45 45 Alliance Manchester Business School UK
31 45 43 Vanderbilt University: Owen US
32 33 33 Fudan University School of Management China
32 43 37 Warwick Business School UK
32 57 48 Rice University: Jones US
35 27 32 Indian Institute of Management Bangalore India
35 54 44 Sungkyunkwan University GSB South Korea
37 35 34 Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore Singapore
38 40 40 Indiana University: Kelley US
39 52 41 IE Business School Spain
40 34 38 University of Florida: Warrington US
40 40 39 University of Texas at Austin: McCombs US
42 65 52 University of California at Irvine: Merage US
43 Michigan State University: Broad US
44 42 45 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta India
44 55 46 Imperial College Business School UK
46 60 57 Babson College: Olin US
47 59 56 Pennsylvania State University: Smeal US
48 50 52 CUHK Business School China
48 61 52 Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad India
50 47 45 Emory University: Goizueta US
51 67 62 Boston University: Questrom US
52 73 66 University of Maryland: Smith US
53 37 47 Shanghai Jiao Tong University: Antai China
54 64 63 WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management Germany
55 Boston College: Carroll US
56 72 71 Ohio State University: Fisher US
57     Arizona State University: Carey US
58 63 55 Singapore Management University: Lee Kong Chian Singapore
58 71 69 Mannheim Business School Germany
60 76 73 University of Rochester: Simon US
61 50 58 City, University of London, The Business School (formerly Cass) UK
62 53 58 Georgia Institute of Technology: Scheller US
63 66 61 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Netherlands
64 68 67 University of St Gallen Switzerland
64 47 Shanghai University of Finance and Economics: College of Business China
66 74 77 SMU: Cox US
67     Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management China
68 70 76 George Washington University US
69 57 61 University of Notre Dame: Mendoza US
69 77   University of Connecticut School of Business US
71 83 77 Brigham Young University: Marriott US
71 78 77 University of Minnesota: Carlson US
73 81 83 University of Texas at Dallas: Jindal US
74 62 60 Durham University Business School UK
75 94 85 University of Toronto: Rotman Canada
76 74 74 University of Pittsburgh: Katz US
76 88   Edhec Business School France
78     Eada Business School Barcelona Spain
79 88 79 AGSM at UNSW Business School Australia
80 81 80 ESMT Berlin Germany
81 88 87 Essec Business School France
82 84 84 The Lisbon MBA Católica/Nova Portugal
83 92 85 Wisconsin School of Business US
84 Ipade Business School Mexico
85 86 90 Texas A & M University: Mays US
86     Rutgers Business School US
87 80 76 Melbourne Business School Australia
87 100   University of Georgia: Terry US
89     William & Mary: Mason US
90 79 83 EMLyon Business School France
91 91 90 McGill University: Desautels Canada
92 Fordham University: Gabelli US
93 93 Miami Herbert Business School US
94 Indian Institute of Management Indore India
94 University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business South Africa
96     Lancaster University Management School UK
97 87 93 Western University: Ivey Canada
98     Copenhagen Business School Denmark
99     Hult International Business School US
100     Queen's University: Smith Canada

Table Note

Footnotes: * KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected survey data provided for the Financial Times 2021 MBA ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the assurance process can be made by contacting Lori Huber of KPMG at The specified audit procedures were carried out between October and November 2020. The audit date published denotes the survey for which the specified audit procedures were conducted.

** Data in this column are for information only and are not used in the rankings. † No data available. Some 202 points separate the top programme, at Insead, from the school ranked 100. The schools are divided into four tiers. Business schools in tiers l and ll score above the average for the cohort, and tiers lll and lV are below it. The difference in scores between schools ranked consecutively is greater within tiers l and lV than in tiers ll and lll. Tier l includes 14 schools from Insead to National University of Singapore Business School. Tier ll includes schools from Cornell University: Johnson, ranked 15, to Babson College: Olin in 46th position. Tier lll, headed by Pennsylvania State University: Smeal, spans schools ranked 47 to 82. Tier lV includes schools from Wisconsin School of Business in 83rd place to Queen's University: Smith at 100.

Download the full ranking as a PDF


您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

 楼主| 发表于 2021-2-8 11:21:04 | 显示全部楼层


This Financial Times MBA ranking features the world’s best 100 full-time MBA programmes. A total of 143 schools took part in the 2021 edition. All participating schools meet the FT’s entry criteria, including being accredited by Equis or the AACSB. 

The FT surveys alumni three years after completing their MBA. For schools to enter the ranking calculations, the FT requires that a minimum of 20 per cent of alumni reply to the survey, with at least 20 fully completed surveys. This year only, because of disruption from the Covid-19 crisis, the FT considered schools with a lower response rate. About 6,570 from the class of 2017 completed our survey — a response rate of 44 per cent. 

The ranking has 20 different criteria. Alumni responses inform eight criteria that together contribute 61 per cent of its weight. Eleven criteria are calculated from school data, accounting for 29 per cent of the ranking. KPMG audits a number of schools every year. The remaining criterion, the research rank, counts for 10 per cent. 

Alumni-informed criteria are based on the data collected over three years. Responses from the 2021 survey carry 50 per cent of total weight and those from 2020 and 2019, 25 per cent each. If only two years of data are available, the weighting is split 60:40 if data are from 2021 and 2020, or 70:30 if they are from 2021 and 2019. For salary figures, the weighting is 50:50 for two years’ data. 

The first two alumni criteria are average income three years after graduation and salary increase compared with pre-MBA salary, both weighted at 20 per cent. For the latter, half of the weight applies to the absolute increase and half to the percentage rise (published). Current salaries are converted to US dollars using November 2020 IMF purchasing power parity rates. 

The salaries of non-profit and public sector workers and full-time students are removed, as are the highest and lowest salaries from each school, to calculate a normalised average. Finally, salaries are weighted to reflect differences between different sectors. 

“Value for money” for each school is calculated by dividing their average alumni salary three years after graduation by their MBA’s total cost, including tuition, lost salary, opportunity cost and other expenses. Any financial help given to alumni is subtracted from the total. 

The FT also collects information from schools on their current faculty, newly enrolled students and the latest graduating class. School criteria include the diversity of staff, board members and students by gender, nationality and the MBA’s international reach. For gender criteria, schools with a 50:50 composition score highest.  The research rank is based on the number of articles by full-time faculty in 50 internationally recognised academic and practitioner journals. The rank combines the number of publications from January 2018 to August 2020, with the number weighted relative to faculty size. 


The corporate social responsibility rank is based on the proportion of teaching hours from core courses dedicated to CSR, ethics, social and environmental issues. It carries a weight of three per cent. 

The FT Global MBA ranking is a relative listing. Schools are ranked against each other by calculating a Z-score for each criterion. The Z-score is a statistic that shows where a score lies in relation to the mean. These scores are then weighted as outlined in the ranking key and added together for a final score. 

After removing schools that did not meet the response rate threshold from the alumni survey, a first version is calculated using all remaining schools. The school at the bottom is removed and a second version is calculated and so on until we reach the top 100. The top 100 schools are ranked accordingly to produce the 2020 list.

Some schools that took part in the ranking previously were unable to participate this time due to challenges from the pandemic. 

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s database consultant.

Financial Times MBA 2021 key

Weights for ranking criteria are shown in brackets as a percentage of the overall ranking. 

Salary today **: average alumnus salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent. This figure is not used in the ranking. # 

Weighted salary (20): average alumnus salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent, with adjustment for variations between sectors. #

Salary increase (20): average difference in alumni salary from before the MBA to now. Half of this figure is calculated according to the absolute salary increase and half according to the percentage increase relative to pre-MBA salary. # 

Value for money (3): calculated using salary today, course length, tuition and other costs, including lost income during the MBA. # 

Career progress (3): calculated according to changes in the level of seniority and the size of company alumni work in now, compared with before their MBA. #  Aims achieved (3): the extent to which alumni fulfilled their stated goals or reasons for doing an MBA. # 

Careers service (3): effectiveness of the school careers service for career counselling, personal development, networking events, internship search and recruitment, as rated by their alumni. # 

Employed at three months (2): percentage of the most recent graduating class which had found employment or accepted a job offer within three months of completing their studies. The figure in brackets is the percentage of the class for which the school was able to provide employment data and is used to calculate the school’s final score in this category. § 

Alumni recommend (3): calculated according to selection by alumni of three schools from which they would recruit MBA graduates. # 

Female faculty (2): percentage of female faculty. 

Female students (2): percentage of female students on the full-time MBA. 

Women on board (1): percentage of female members on the school’s advisory board. 

International faculty (4): calculated according to the diversity of faculty by citizenship and the percentage whose nationality differs from their country of employment — the figure published in the table. ‡ 

International students (4): calculated according to the diversity of current MBA students by citizenship and the percentage whose nationality differs from the country in which they study — the figure in the table. ‡ 

International board (2): percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the country in which the school is based. 

International mobility (6): based on alumni citizenship and the countries where they worked before their MBA, on graduation and three years after. 

International course experience (3): calculated according to whether the most recent graduating MBA class completed exchanges and company internships, lasting at least a month, in countries other than where the school is based. For 2021, the calculation was based on the average across the past two or three years of international course experience data, if available. For schools that have taken part for the first time this year, only data from the 2021 survey were used.

Extra languages (1): number of languages required on graduation, excluding English. § 

Faculty with doctorates (5): percentage of full-time faculty with a doctoral degree. 

FT research rank (10): calculated according to the number of articles published by current full-time faculty members in 50 selected academic and practitioner journals between January 2018 and July 2020. The FT50 rank combines the absolute number of publications with the number weighted relative to the faculty’s size. 

Corporate social responsibility (3): proportion of teaching hours from core courses dedicated to CSR, ethics, social and environmental issues. 

Overall satisfaction **: average evaluation by alumni of the course, scored out of 10. After alumni answered various questions about their MBA experience, they were asked to rate their overall satisfaction, on a 10-point scale. This figure is not used in the ranking. 


Schools with a 50:50 (male/female) composition receive the highest possible score in the three gender-related criteria. 

§ Alumni who completed MBA between July 2019 and June 2020. 

# Includes data for the class of 2017 and one or two preceding classes where available. 

‡ While we recognise the distinction between Chinese and Taiwanese scholars and students, within China no such distinction may have been observed when recording diversity. 

** Category not used in the ranking. 

The FT research rank was calculated using Clarivate Analytics data from the Web of Science, an abstract and citation database of research literature.

 楼主| 发表于 2021-2-8 11:29:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 14:35:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 16:21:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 16:23:34 发自手机 Web 版 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 16:34:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 16:40:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 16:43:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2021-2-8 17:40:03 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

GMT+8, 2021-4-19 07:09 , Processed in 0.217840 second(s), 9 queries , Memcache On.

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2021 All Rights Reserved.