随便谈谈对ur/brandy/uiuc/ucsd/jhu这类msf项目的看法

jerrymaxxy

谢谢楼主

Musitata

看一下！

午夜雀雨

同意！               

lalaha

同意！               

IvanYu

。

cheesechan

Loginstate 发表于 2019-3-19 14:32
请假一下大大 刚刚拿到了nyu econ的录取，因为不是纯正的金融本科出身，这些金融课程上的不足是不是能通过 ...

1. I will say yes, but not 100%. At the end, a good MSF will go more in-depth than CFA.
You may consider spending your elective in advanced finance course to cover those topic.
(CPA maybe more valuable for China market?)

2. Business school or not doesnt matter that much. You are not in their MBA anyway.
Near all US MSF are for funding purpose. Their student won't enjoy that US business school level career service even they are in the business school as MSF is never the flagship there. Resource focus, and the job market values more on MBA anyway.

3. 你有統計背景, 再加經濟碩士, 這個組合怎樣leverage to financial industry, (除了拼命找實習外), 選課上怎搞最有效可以參考一下Duke MQFE, Toronto MFE, LSE MFE, Ox MFE........

P.S. 你一樓講某MSF說課程偏quant, 但"随机过程/金融随机分析都不提供", 我猜你是說JHU MSF吧? 用business school MSF standard, 有continuous time finance也就夠了.
像WUSTL Q track, 也是前一個半學期在上MSF類, 真扔quantitative課的數目也有限, JHU MSF這類也相差不太遠了.

要真走quant路線的, 一早該去MFE, 不要花太多時間盯著business school. 更加不應該去申甚麼MSF.
大多數好的MFE都不(只)是business school host的 (maybe only UCB and UCLA are the exceptional)
數理背景不夠申不上MFE? 那大三大四不早點去選多點數學統計計算機課?


P.S.2
Q: 為甚麼要去US這堆二流的, 不去英國G5/香港top 3?
A: 有幾個可能性:
1. 根本沒這選擇. 背景不夠好, 英國G5, HK top 3都沒申上.
2. 崇美. 人傻錢多.

djalkd

看一下

Saiki金金

Mark一下！               

Loginstate

cheesechan 发表于 2019-3-19 17:35
1. I will say yes, but not 100%. At the end, a good MSF will go more in-depth than CFA.
You may con ...

感谢大大回复 受教了

huancai

y