ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2078|回复: 6

OG716题求解释

[复制链接]
发表于 2018-11-16 11:40:48 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Digging in sediments in northern China, evidence has been gathered by scientists suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had previously thought.

A. evidence has been gathered by scientists suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had
B. evidence gathered by scientists suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than had been
C. scientists have gathered evidence suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than
D. scientists have gathered evidence that suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that which was
E. scientists have gathered evidence which suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that

请问C和E之间该如何判断?OG上的解释是说
In this context it would be preferable to use a verb (emerged). The phrasing used here (suggests a much earlier emergence of  ) sounds more stilted and is less clear and direct.
请问有前辈可以解释解释吗?还有E最后的 than that看上去是有点怪怪的,可以讲解一下吗?

发表于 2018-11-16 13:06:37 | 显示全部楼层
1. emerged vs emergency --> 如果emerge这个动作是complex life-forms 发出来的那么一般gmac都倾向用动词形式而不是动词的名词形式,因为动词的名词形式一般没有一个特定发出的主语;

2. e选项当中which的用法也是错的,which的用法一般是非限制性定语,即“,which”或者是“in which" "at which"之类的才可以省略which前面的逗号;

3. that 不能指代scientists;句子的意思是scientists have gathered evidence suggesting that... than [scientists] previously thought.
 楼主| 发表于 2018-11-17 01:00:25 | 显示全部楼层
fuckoffand 发表于 2018-11-16 13:06
1. emerged vs emergency --> 如果emerge这个动作是complex life-forms 发出来的那么一般gmac都倾向用动词 ...

very clear! thank you so much!
发表于 2018-11-17 10:00:38 | 显示全部楼层
2. e选项当中which的用法也是错的,which的用法一般是非限制性定语,即“,which”或者是“in which" "at which"之类的才可以省略which前面的逗号

有关上面,2019OG 已经官方澄清不会考 that 和 which 区别了 ,所以千万别拿这个作为排除点
可以参考下

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1325360-1-1.html
发表于 2018-11-17 16:45:58 | 显示全部楼层
D E 后半部分的比较存在和前句 “不平行”的问题。
A B initial modifier 只能修饰 scientists
发表于 2018-11-19 10:44:17 | 显示全部楼层
spicytaco 发表于 2018-11-17 10:00
2. e选项当中which的用法也是错的,which的用法一般是非限制性定语,即“,which”或者是“in which" "at w ...

nice!所以which前面不加逗号也是对的了?
发表于 2018-11-19 11:19:01 | 显示全部楼层
fuckoffand 发表于 2018-11-19 10:44
nice!所以which前面不加逗号也是对的了?

俺的理解是不能作为排除点了,还是找其他的排除点
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 13:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部