ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7784|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求问OG17 verbal分册SC299

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-7-17 22:49:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Once numbering in the millions worldwide, it is estimated that the wolf has declined to 200,000 in 57 countries, some 11,000 of them to be found in the lower 48 United States and Alaska.
A. it is estimated that the wolf has declined to 200,000 in 57 countries, some
B. the wolf is estimated to have declined to 200,000 in 57 countries, with approximately
C. the wolf has declined to an estimate of 200,000 in 57 countries, some
D. wolves have declined to an estimate of 200,000 in 57 countries, with approximately
E. wolves have declined to an estimated 200,000 in 57 countries, some
正确答案是E。求问答案D中declined to an estimate of..的用法错误点,以及 with approximately...这里的用法是不是正确。


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-7-17 23:55:13 | 只看该作者
楼主 你看下这个帖子  我觉得对你可能有帮助 你问的问题 里面全解答啦  (嘻嘻 半夜逛CD 正好看到了  我也不会 就去搜了下  觉得很清晰讲的 分享给你)

http://www.beatthegmat.com/once-numbering-in-the-millions-worldwide-t291940.html下面的摘录 第一个是回答你第二个with结构 是否正确的问题 ,第二个回答第一个关于用法的问题  超级清晰~

摘录
comma with 的问题
by instructor
Generally, COMMA + with after a clause must serve to express HOW the preceding action is performed.
D: Wolves have declined, with approximately 11,000 of them to be found in the lower 48 States.
Here, the COMMA + with modifier in red serves to express not how wolves HAVE DECLINED (the preceding action) but where they are currently FOUND.
Since the COMMA + with modifier is misused, eliminate D.
之后这位instructor 又用另一道OG题举例子
A COMMA + with modifier must serve to express HOW the preceding action is facilitated.
SC78 in the OG11:
Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.

Here, the COMMA + with modifier in blue logically expresses how the preceding act of SLEEPING is facilitated.

然后你的另一个问题 ,是由另一位解答的,我觉得也挺清晰
摘录如下
The sentence begins with a participial modifier. What was numbering in the millions? Wolves. That leaves us with D or E.
D, read literally, makes it sound as though the wolves have declined to an estimate. This is illogical. The author is trying to convey that the population has declined to an estimated number. (Note that in D, "estimate" is used as a noun - the thing the wolves declined to - whereas in E, "estimated" is used to modify 200,000, which is the number the population has declined to.)
嘻嘻 我把他说的话 全粘上来了  因为我觉得他第一步直接处理掉 3个选项 也是棒棒的~





板凳
发表于 2017-7-18 01:03:42 | 只看该作者
噜啦啦biu 发表于 2017-7-17 23:55
楼主 你看下这个帖子  我觉得对你可能有帮助 你问的问题 里面全解答啦  (嘻嘻 半夜逛CD 正好看到了  我也不 ...

谢谢摘录~~凭语感选的,看了解释清楚多了
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2017-7-20 21:23:26 | 只看该作者
噜啦啦biu 发表于 2017-7-17 23:55
楼主 你看下这个帖子  我觉得对你可能有帮助 你问的问题 里面全解答啦  (嘻嘻 半夜逛CD 正好看到了  我也不 ...

你好棒!解释很清楚,谢谢啦!
5#
发表于 2017-8-11 18:54:06 | 只看该作者
请问,这个once numbering, 不应该是once numbered 吗?wolves 不是 number 动作的发出者吧
6#
发表于 2017-8-12 11:10:29 | 只看该作者
小黄鸭YAYYAYA 发表于 2017-8-11 18:54
请问,这个once numbering, 不应该是once numbered 吗?wolves 不是 number 动作的发出者吧 ...

永远都不要去质疑正确选项呢  更不要去改 哈哈我的理解是numbering 可以理解成 达到什么什么数量 这里意思就是狼达到百万的数量了~  

7#
发表于 2017-12-1 05:53:48 | 只看该作者
对于“Generally, COMMA + with after a clause must serve to express HOW the preceding action is performed. ”我持怀疑态度。例如:Starfish have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and growing an extra one or two. 这里with引导的独立主格就不表示HOW the arm is replaced。这里with引导的独立主格表的就是解释说明(根据语意判断的)。
D选项的with引导的独立主格,approximately用法错误,这个词应该是形容后面的11,000 of them。副词是没法修饰名词的。
8#
发表于 2018-8-7 07:58:35 | 只看该作者
独白 发表于 2017-12-1 05:53
对于“Generally, COMMA + with after a clause must serve to express HOW the preceding action is perfo ...

我的看法是:Starfish 这句话中, and if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced 是一个modifier,所以说with引导的实际上是跟在Starfish have a strong regenerative ability 后面,表示的是How the regenerative ability performed.
这一句的原话简单来看应该是:
Starfish have a strong regenerative ability with the animal sometimes overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.
9#
发表于 2019-7-14 16:04:32 | 只看该作者
独白 发表于 2017-12-1 05:53
对于“Generally, COMMA + with after a clause must serve to express HOW the preceding action is perfo ...

不對,有些副詞可以修飾名詞
about, rather都是,所以這個判題點錯誤
10#
发表于 2019-8-28 15:12:07 | 只看该作者
TimTheOne 发表于 2019-7-14 16:04
不對,有些副詞可以修飾名詞
about, rather都是,所以這個判題點錯誤

所有副词都不能修饰名词或者名词短语。这点曼哈顿解释很清楚了。
about rather后面跟名词的时候都是在使用其作为介词的属性。

另外,同意with引导解释主句how的说法。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-21 00:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部