ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 893|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

FeiFei-95

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-1 15:05:00 | 只看该作者

FeiFei-95

95. Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams conducted by single researchers.


Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


(A) Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing themselves in subsequent papers.


(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received.


(C) The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the research it reports.


(D) The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by international collaboration.

(E) International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single researchers.
沙发
发表于 2005-9-2 02:22:00 | 只看该作者

题目最后一句话有问题


“This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams conducted by single researchers. ”


板凳
发表于 2005-9-5 04:23:00 | 只看该作者
the last sentence should be" the diff show research conducted by team is more important than by single"

now the answer is very easy to pick

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 23:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部