- UID
- 988424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1. both plan 1 (HK then job there) and plan 2 (UK then back China) are reasonable. You have to choose one youself. Follow your heart in this issue.
2. "听IC的学姐说RMFE这个项目的只要你技术过硬回国来是可以找到薪酬不错的好工作的" <--- so, what do you mean by 技術過硬? good english? good knowledge about the market? good mathematical modeling and programming skills? I guess the definition of this depends on which division of role it is, but I dont think IC RMFE provide good training in any of them.
3. It is understandable that you want to work in 外資. So the correct approach to it is not to say "I want it", but try to increase your skill, and make yourself more competitive in the job market. You wont have time to be excellent in many fields, and thus you need to lock up with really a few (or even one or two closely related one) and prepare well.
4. mathematics and programming is of course not a must for finance - it is just a must for financial engineering and data analysis. Again, this is back to the old question - which type of role you want? This is your own question. There is not good vs bad, but fit yourself or not.
5. I dont buy the idea of a pre-experience MSF. In most case, it is better to be an specialist in something, given a general finance background can be shown by CFA.
MS in related major (no matter it is statistics, economics, law, accounting) + CFA > MSF + CFA
6. Financial Engineering is mathematics - applied mathematics. Nearly all top / good MFE are from math/stat/OR (sci and engineering) faculty, or a close cooperation between business school and them. (well, not sure UCB and UCLA are the exception - but their MFE are near guaranting 100% intership/employment...........and not taking 200 student and milking tuition from them).
I am not saying FE program from business school are bad.......what I mean is: any FE program that are not mathematical enough are not good enough. Mathematics up at CFA, FRM level at not enough for this field - far not enough.
Programming in R/MATLAB, stochastic process, stochastic calculus are all essential for risk and financial engineering. If you want to skip any of these, forget about any FE master (which include HKUST FM, IC RMFE...)
7. I am not a fans of a pre-experience master in risk too. Same logic as (5), what study something that can be self-studied and shown through external professional exam?. Risk, or finance is about function, a role, instead of a discipline or clear tools itself.
8. If you think that you are not that top in mathematics, and wanna skip all those stochastic calculus and etc (well, indeed skipping stochastic calculus is kind of skipping financial engineering, at least all the advanced part of it.........)...well, this is your choice. Again not something good or bad, but you have to know what kind of role you are giving up....(again not a bad idea to give that up if you really dont like / cant master that...just have to know the consquence only).
Same logic hold for programming on data analysis stuffs too indeed.
9. $$ issue: imagine you are paying that out from your own pocket, and make that decision.
10. relationship issue: distance relationship is not something easy, be prepared for that.
P.S.1 PM me.
P.S.2 You wont go wrong with any of the choice. You will get something - just not sure if that is something you want the most only.
P.S.3 LSE, IC BS are both master supermarket. Tons of master in various field for sales to get $$. The whole world knows that already. (this is the case for most taught master over the world indeed - UK is never alone)
P.S.4 I suggest that you should look into the program structure, and the course outline to know more about what are available indeed.....dont just judge it by the program name.
|
|
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2017-2-28 16:45:37
