ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 999|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问一道GWD 求大神进来看看

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-9-15 14:25:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Untilthe passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, afirst-time charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge,federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers,while offenders were subject to relatively small penalties.
A.charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyrightinfringers, while offenders were
B.charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyrightinfringers, offenders being
C.charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers,while offenders were
D.charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminalcopyright infringers and offenders being
E.charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminalcopyright infringers, and offenders were
正确选项E)
对选E没有疑问 但是不是很理解E里面therefore的使用 后面一句是在解释前面 为啥用therefore因果关系副词

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-9-15 16:48:30 | 只看该作者
我觉得后面一句不是对前面一句的解释,是根据第一句话的推断(likely)
板凳
发表于 2016-9-16 13:16:25 | 只看该作者
because ---the first-time charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor
.
therefore ----federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminalcopyright infringers

因为第一次判罚都仅仅只是轻罪
所以prosecutors 不太可能当刑事案件来诉讼
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 21:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部