OG 16 Verbal 58 问是否有歧义

白冬冬

58.  A patient accusing a doctor of malpractice will find it difficult to prove damage if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.

A if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify  

B unless there will be another doctor to testify  

C without another doctor's testimony  

D should there be no testimony from some other doctor  

E lacking another doctor to testify

OA: C

问题：C 不会有歧义吗？without... 短语难道没有可能就近修饰了damage？ 感觉句子是有 “条件状语” 的意思，没有了if，就没有假设这层含义。

所以A虽然丑陋， 还是错选了A。。。

谢谢解答！

医生吃鱼

1、A选项中有绝对语法错误啊：a lack of sb to do结构。

2、C选项中的without能包含if含义，甚至还能连接虚拟语气。

OG16-SC88：Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure

3、C选项中不会有修饰歧义，因为无论如何，damage without testimony都不合逻辑吧？GMAC还是有点节操的，不会那么死扣语法

白冬冬

医生吃鱼 发表于 2016-3-25 21:08
1、A选项中有绝对语法错误啊：a lack of sb to do结构。

2、C选项中的without能包含if含义，甚至还能连接 ...

现在进入了做傻了的节奏，已经开始越做越错。木哈哈。。。。

医生吃鱼

白冬冬 发表于 2016-3-25 21:22
现在进入了做傻了的节奏，已经开始越做越错。木哈哈。。。。

是会这样的，我现在会把以前都作对的题做错。

SC真是深似海啊！