ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7992|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Laos has a land area老题求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-3-23 11:22:06 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
—看千行的时候发现的老题,OG13 43
43. Laos has a landarea about the same as Great Britain but only four million inpopulation, where many aremembers of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleysof the north.
—
—(A) about the same asGreat Britain but only four million in population, where many—
—(B) of about the samesize as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only fourmillion, and many—
—(C) that is about thesame size as Great Britain’s land area, but in Laos with a population of onlyfour million people, many of them—
—(D) comparable to thesize of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many—
—(E) comparable tothat of Great Britain but a population of only four million people, many ofwhom


卡在了CE之间,看了Ron,OG的解释,仍对C中them指代four million people抱有幻想,我认为C 的结构是Lao has..., but...many of them are....,but连接两个句子不算run on sentence,them指代前面的four million people。求解释这样理解有什么问题??


以下是Ron的解释
Q: I can not figure out the sentense structure. Say, "a population of only 4 million people" after "but" is used for what?
the "but" creates parallelism between the 2 nouns describing things that laos has.
with choice (e), the sentence reads as follows: laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only 4 million people, many of whom...
so, basically, laos has X but Y, where X and Y show some kind of contrast with each other. (the contrast here is apparent, as great britain certainly has more than four million inhabitants.)


千行里关于many of whom 和many of which的解释:
"many of whom" is not a subject pronoun; it's a relative pronoun. it has EXACTLY the same grammar as plural "which".
if you understand why i adopted two dogs, which weigh approximately 100 pounds each or i adopted two dogs, each of which weighs approximately 100 pounds is not a run-on sentence, then you also understand why (e) is not a run-on sentence.
by contrast, if the sentence had contained "many of them", then it would be a run-on.
so: *i adopted two dogs, they weigh approximately 100 pounds each is a run-on sentence (--> incorrect). for the same reason, *i adopted two dogs, each of them weighs approximately 100 pounds and *... a population of only 4 million people, many of them are members of hill tribes... would also be run-on sentences (--> incorrect).



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-3-23 12:06:02 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-23 13:20:10 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-3-23 12:06
当时这个题我也不会做,
后来做题发现
but, while后面只要和前面主语一样的话,后面的主语可以省略而且去掉 ...

我明白E中but是对的,但C中but看成连接两个完整句子是不对的吗?如果可以,那them不能指代people是因为them不能指代immediate precedent的rule吗?
地板
发表于 2016-3-23 13:37:13 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
5#
发表于 2016-3-23 13:43:11 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-23 13:58:23 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-3-23 13:43
C里面but那个句子没有主语谓语,but是要加句子的。

in laos是个方位介词。

but后面是句子呀,many of them are....
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-23 13:58:44 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-3-23 13:43
C里面but那个句子没有主语谓语,but是要加句子的。

in laos是个方位介词。

不过with a population看起来更像修饰laos的而不是这些人
8#
发表于 2016-3-23 14:39:18 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-24 08:42:46 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-3-23 14:39
many of them和who差不错,是个从句不是句子

哦要是单独句子的话them指代的对象应该在本句里,而不是上句里,大概这个意思?
10#
发表于 2016-3-24 09:16:27 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-22 16:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部