继续变态贴完argu再贴一篇刚才写的AI129

sacrati

Issue 129

Instead of relying on the advice of outside experts, organization should place greater value on the advice that can come only from their own highly experienced employees.

正文

The speaker asserts that when an organization wants to gain some advice, it is better for them to turn to their own highly experienced employees for advice than to turn to outside experts for help. Although the speaker’s assertion is not wholly insupportable, the speaker fails to consider the advantage of the turn to outside experts. In my view, both will have its strength and weakness and the final judgment should depend on the specific situation that the organization has to face.

To begin with, it is admitted that the own employees of the organization are more familiar with the routine of the organization, thus having a more clear knowledge of their own organization. And in the meantime, they all have specialized in the related field for years, which means that they have a more deep and detailed knowledge and skills to give advice for dealing with the problems or job they have to solve.

On the other hand, the outside experts’ advice is more objective when compared with the advice brought about by the organization’s own employees. It is the truth that the employees inside an organization cannot look at the problem broadly and objectively, which will cause their advice is not as objective as outside experts’. To be specific, the cause that some employees’ self-interest may be involved in the procedure of giving his or her advice will do harm to the effectiveness and the fairness of the advice he or she give; otherwise, outside experts have no such problems that it is not probably for them to have own interest in the giving of the advice.

In addition, the more experienced knowledge and skills of the outside experts will have a good influence on the advice they give. As a case in point, the outside experts may have dealt with the similar problems in the similar organization. It is entirely possible that the employees inside the organization have never met such problems before, thereby making it difficult for them to give good advice which can be helpful in solving the problem. Consequently, if the outside experts have the related experience of solving the problem, their advice will definitely have more value and will cast a good effect in solving problems.

In the final analysis, it is hard to find an evenhanded standard to tell which advice will be more valuable for an organization. The organization should consider the problem they have to face and the different characters of the different advice and other factors before deciding which advice has more value and which advice to adopt.

happyfish0517

gg写的还真都挺长~~明天见！~

happyfish0517

以下是引用sacrati在2005-7-23 22:37:00的发言：

Issue 129

Instead of relying on the advice of outside experts, organization should place greater value on the advice that can come only from their own highly experienced employees.

正文

The speaker asserts that when an organization wants to gain some advice, it is better for them to turn to their own highly experienced employees for advice than to turn to outside experts for help. Although the speaker’s assertion is not wholly insupportable, the speaker fails to consider the advantage of the turn to outside experts. In my view, both will have its strength and weakness and the final judgment should depend on the specific situation that the organization has to face.

the advantage of the turn to outside experts. 不符合语法，应该是the advantage of the advice from outsiders更好一些吧。

gg好像issue都喜欢写成既不赞同又不反对，而且不偏不倚。一般的习惯即使不wholly accepted也会表达出大负小正，或者大正小负的看法...有些倾向或强调...这样完全中立，所有的都是case to case study...我稍微有点不习惯...呵呵...个人观点吧。

To begin with, it is admitted that the own employees of the organization are more familiar with the routine of the organization, thus having a more clear knowledge of their own organization. And in the meantime, they all have specialized in the related field for years, which means that they have a more deep and detailed knowledge and skills to give advice for dealing with the problems or job they have to solve.

On the other hand, the outside experts’ advice is more objective when compared with the advice brought about by the organization’s own employees. It is the truth that the employees inside an organization cannot look at the problem broadly and objectively, which will cause their advice is not as objective as outside experts’. To be specific, the cause that some employees’ self-interest may be involved in the procedure of giving his or her advice will do harm to the effectiveness and the fairness of the advice he or she give; otherwise, outside experts have no such problems that it is not probably for them to have own interest in the giving of the advice.

In addition, the more experienced knowledge and skills of the outside experts will have a good influence on the advice they give. As a case in point, the outside experts may have dealt with the similar problems in the similar organization. It is entirely possible that the employees inside the organization have never met such problems before, thereby making it difficult for them to give good advice which can be helpful in solving the problem. Consequently, if the outside experts have the related experience of solving the problem, their advice will definitely have more value and will cast a good effect in solving problems.

In the final analysis, it is hard to find an evenhanded standard to tell which advice will be more valuable for an organization. The organization should consider the problem they have to face and the different characters of the different advice and other factors before deciding which advice has more value and which advice to adopt.

看得出来，gg的模版已经基本成形了...我建议这样就不需要每篇文章都写出全文了，gg可以更多地把时间放在提纲的思考上，参与提纲讨论，这样会有效率很多...只要有1、2、3几个成形的论述方向，形成自己的观点，到时候碰到自然写得出来...每篇awa题目在考前都写一遍多少有些得不偿失...更多的时间可以用来复习verbal...

a za a za fighting...等你好消息

sacrati

en

thank you for your precious advice and i really appreciate it !!!

GMAT白骨精

哈哈,喜欢斑竹的基努里维斯

天之角

晕，那好像不是吧，

好像挺像，呵呵