ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: cheeyong
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有关大陆学生GMAT成绩底线的问题

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-7-4 11:45:00 | 只看该作者

支持 ~~~~~~~

个人也是这样认为的·

12#
发表于 2006-7-5 12:03:00 | 只看该作者
那710就是鸡肋分数了。如果我认为我其他方面都不错, 需要为那10分去重考吗?困惑
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-5 15:37:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得不需要重考了,因为即使你考到了740,两个成绩给BS,他们也会奇怪:710已经不错了,这个申请者为什么还要再去考呢?个人意见,仅供参考。

14#
发表于 2006-7-5 17:29:00 | 只看该作者

其实GMAT并不很重要,但是美国人挑留学生,GMAT还是主要的衡量准则,只好考高点了。录取的平均成绩是700分,其实成绩是650~780。

为了进工科学校,很多中国学生GRE要考2000分,我大学同学先移民的,进了一个TOP 20的工程院,托福一般,GRE都不要考。

15#
发表于 2006-7-5 18:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用天香国猪在2006-7-5 17:29:00的发言:

其实GMAT并不很重要,但是美国人挑留学生,GMAT还是主要的衡量准则,只好考高点了。录取的平均成绩是700分,其实成绩是650~780。

为了进工科学校,很多中国学生GRE要考2000分,我大学同学先移民的,进了一个TOP 20的工程院,托福一般,GRE都不要考。

这点对MBA的中国人这个POOL绝对不适用

移民以后按照米国人对待了, 自然分数不重要

我们这里讨论的还是大多数没有移民的中国人的CASE

16#
发表于 2006-7-5 18:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用eternalwind在2006-7-5 18:03:00的发言:

这点对MBA的中国人这个POOL绝对不适用

移民以后按照米国人对待了, 自然分数不重要

我们这里讨论的还是大多数没有移民的中国人的CASE

I would say this does apply to the candidate with extroadinary background.

Chinese with very good work experience and educational background should not worry about the GMAT score, as long as it is over 700. But how to make yourself Extroadinary is very important.

I came to the states as international student, got my scholarship first, so the school asked me to pass the minimum requirement of GRE, which was 1100 (math+verbal).


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-5 18:49:50编辑过]
17#
发表于 2006-7-5 19:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用天香国猪在2006-7-5 18:48:00的发言:

I would say this does apply to the candidate with extroadinary background.

Chinese with very good work experience and educational background should not worry about the GMAT score, as long as it is over 700. But how to make yourself Extroadinary is very important.

I came to the states as international student, got my scholarship first, so the school asked me to pass the minimum requirement of GRE, which was 1100 (math+verbal).


So what? Foe Science and Engineering majors, a lot of people do not need any exams to get the scholarships or assistanships. As long long as the professors need to find some people who can do research and work for them, they never care about T or G. I have seens a lot of examples that CHinese students directly went to US without any exams cause their domestic advisors recommended them to US profs.

However, for MBA, story is different. If you take a look at the resumes of those admitted by top b-schools, you can easily find out that Chinese students profiles are just so so compared with their US counterpoaties. Why? Because in US, MBA degrees are the key to promotion while in CHina, probably not. As a result, a lot of US talents will treat MBA a necessary step in their career path while a lot of young CHinese may not think so. In my opinion, I do not think you can find many so-called extraordinary young people in CHinese applicants. Most of the applicants will just have similar so-so backgrounds. Then, how to distinguish yourself from this similar pool? first, essays; second, recommendations; third, GMAT. Of course you may still have chances to go to good schools without a decent G score, but a low G will make your application more tough. As far as I know, G is the easiest part in applicaiton. For any person with 2 months' training, he./she can easily hit 750. So why not spend more time in G to get a decent score?

18#
发表于 2006-7-6 05:19:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用eternalwind在2006-7-5 19:04:00的发言:

So what? Foe Science and Engineering majors, a lot of people do not need any exams to get the scholarships or assistanships. As long long as the professors need to find some people who can do research and work for them, they never care about T or G. I have seens a lot of examples that CHinese students directly went to US without any exams cause their domestic advisors recommended them to US profs.

However, for MBA, story is different. If you take a look at the resumes of those admitted by top b-schools, you can easily find out that Chinese students profiles are just so so compared with their US counterpoaties. Why? Because in US, MBA degrees are the key to promotion while in CHina, probably not. As a result, a lot of US talents will treat MBA a necessary step in their career path while a lot of young CHinese may not think so. In my opinion, I do not think you can find many so-called extraordinary young people in CHinese applicants. Most of the applicants will just have similar so-so backgrounds. Then, how to distinguish yourself from this similar pool? first, essays; second, recommendations; third, GMAT. Of course you may still have chances to go to good schools without a decent G score, but a low G will make your application more tough. As far as I know, G is the easiest part in applicaiton. For any person with 2 months' training, he./she can easily hit 750. So why not spend more time in G to get a decent score?

"So what? " I think you are loaded, maybe too much stress. I don't want to start a fight. With so much eduation, I think you also know how we should behave when it comes to discussion.

我觉得700分以上就已经很Decent了。

如果知道,每年750分以上的,800分的有多少?这些人有多少被录取了?录取的这些人有多少是750分以上的?就没有什么好争执的了。

就象你说的GMAT成绩只是排第三而已,我觉得花更多时间在第一第二上,拿一个700+的分数就可以了。

我只是在这里学习的而已,相信你也是。

19#
发表于 2006-7-19 23:12:00 | 只看该作者

这个分析极不实际

中国学生被top20录取的 G的平均成绩是760左右
20#
发表于 2006-7-19 23:28:00 | 只看该作者

“中国学生被top20录取的 G的平均成绩是760左右”

有这么高嘛?不会吧?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-31 02:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部