这素一份弱弱的总结 "Which" Modifier - Thursday with Ron

ConstanceXC

多谢总结和分享！！

jesswong

请大神帮忙
Bill Gates donates many trucks to NY, which make the government of NY happy.(correct)
I took pictures in 1995, which are so adorable that...(incorrect)
这两个句子介词这里有什么本质区别吗。。。感觉都是指向前面的动词（donate/took）为什么就一个对一个不对了呢

smilEvEline

虽然是刊登很久才看到这一篇，还是觉得题主总结的好棒，感谢

emguan

顶楼主！               

MiaJia

Bill Gates donates many trucks to New York, which make the government of New York
happy. (Correct)
Ø Bill Gates donates a hundred million dollars to New York, which makes the government
of New York happy. （”New york makes the government happy” doesn’t make sense. ）

第二句为什么错呢？不是和第一句一样的结构么？

neverland333

Bill Gates donates many trucks to New York, which make the government of New York happy. (Correct)

Ø Bill Gates donates a hundred million dollars to New York, which makes the government of New York happy. （”New york makes the government happy” doesn’t make sense. ）

Ø Bill Gates donates New York a hundred million dollars, which makes the government of New York happy.  (“a hundred million dollars makes the government happy” is correct. )

想问一下答主 这些句子的出处？
第一句，如果句子正确，按照主谓一致，那么which的确指代的就是trucks.但是ron说能够跨越修饰去指代前面的名词前提是这个修饰必须是修饰这个名词的，我不大清楚to Newyork如果从修饰角度来说是修饰什么？

第二句，从第二句的解释来看，答主应该是认为to New York是修饰donate的，所以which无法指代a hundred million dollars,只能指代newyork,句子意思不对，所以第二句是错的。可是如果这样的话不是和第一句矛盾了吗？因为如果to new York是修饰donate的话，第一句就是错的啊

最后：私以为which 这里有修饰前面一整个句子的嫌疑。。。而GMAC不允许这样做。。所以希望答主回复一下这部分内容的出处，如果不是而GMAT相关的，就没有必要纠结了。

多谢

Zxixixixi

谢谢楼主~~~~

jflasj

楼主你真的是天使，爱思你了！

wyn0103

Mark!