ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4755|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

质疑大全74题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-15 12:15:00 | 只看该作者

质疑大全74题

        All-terrain vehicles have allowed vacationers to reach many previously inaccessible areas, but they have also been blamed for causing hundreds of deaths, injury to thousands, and seriously damaging the nation’s recreational areas.


(A) deaths, injury to thousands, and seriously damaging


(B) deaths and injuring thousands, and serious damage to


(C) deaths, thousands who are injured, as well as seriously damaging


(D) deaths and thousands of injuries, as well as doing serious damage toD


(E) deaths, thousands are injured, and they do serious damage to



我觉得答案是A,因为D中的DOING和前面的并列不匹配,请大家讨论

沙发
发表于 2005-4-15 14:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用echo0221在2005-4-15 12:15:00的发言:

        All-terrain vehicles have allowed vacationers to reach many previously inaccessible areas, but they have also been blamed for causing hundreds of deaths, injury to thousands, and seriously damaging the nation’s recreational areas.


(A) deaths, injury to thousands, and seriously damaging


划线部分的三者并列,肯定错误;


(B) deaths and injuring thousands, and serious damage to


(C) deaths, thousands who are injured, as well as seriously damaging


(D) deaths and thousands of injuries, as well as doing serious damage toD


划线部分由and引导并列,as well as与前面的for 后面的doing并列,正确结构;


(E) deaths, thousands are injured, and they do serious damage to



我觉得答案是A,因为D中的DOING和前面的并列不匹配,请大家讨论


btw:不要轻易质疑,除非你有充分的证据。

板凳
发表于 2005-4-15 21:53:00 | 只看该作者
平行必须结合句意, 死记硬背是很难应付灵活题目的.
地板
发表于 2005-5-15 20:50:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得"doing the damage to"的有效性比直接用“damaging" 差,但“injury to thousands"与”hundreds of deaths“的不平行是绝对错误,所以应选D。不知这样理解对不对?


5#
发表于 2006-11-23 19:44:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思把这个题挖出来!

我觉得大家选d的理由比较明确,不过d中的doing damage读起来很不舒服。

不知道大家为啥没有选b呢?

All-terrain vehicles have allowed vacationers to reach many previously inaccessible areas, but they have also been blamed for causing hundreds of deaths and injuring thousands, and (for) serious damage to the nation’s recreational areas.

6#
发表于 2008-8-17 21:55:00 | 只看该作者
up
7#
发表于 2009-7-20 21:07:00 | 只看该作者
dd
8#
发表于 2011-8-23 15:45:38 | 只看该作者
我觉得这里的D选项也只是择优吧·
as well as seriously damaging
seriously前应该最好加个for, 跟前面 (blamed) for doing 平行,逼近介词最好不能省啊··大家觉得呢?
9#
发表于 2012-3-21 21:47:46 | 只看该作者
同意ls
10#
发表于 2014-3-27 03:20:50 | 只看该作者
浅吟天 发表于 2012-3-21 21:47
同意ls

我觉得D里面 doing是和causing平行的,然后deaths and thousands of injuries 是一个并列。就是两个平行结构 大平行套小平行
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 02:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部