ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A patient accusing a doctor of malpractice will find it difficult to prove damage if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2990|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

MM和GG们 请教og 146

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-28 06:29:00 | 只看该作者

MM和GG们 请教og 146


146. A patient accusing a doctor of malpractice will find it difficult to prove damage if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.
(A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify
(B) unless there will be another doctor to testify
(C) without another doctor's testimony
(D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor
(E) lacking another doctor to testify
Only C, the best choice, manages to convey the meaning of the sentence efficiently and idiomatically. Choices A and D are plagued by awkwardness and wordiness. Choice A also introduces the unidiomatic phrase lack of some other doctor.
  Choice B incorrectly uses a future-tense verb (will be) in the if clause; the if clause must use the present tense if it is preceded, as here, by a result clause that uses a future-tense verb (e.g., will find). Choice E introduces a dangling modifier: the lacking ... phrase cannot logically modify damage, the nearest noun.


What is the "if clause" in choice B?


沙发
发表于 2005-3-28 08:29:00 | 只看该作者
指的是条件语句。主句如果是一般将来时,则从句要用一般现在时,所以B错
板凳
发表于 2005-5-2 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

B选项明明就是unless,为什么OG要说IF条件语句呢??

. Choice B incorrectly uses a future-tense verb (will be) in the if clause;

地板
发表于 2005-5-9 16:41:00 | 只看该作者

UP

5#
发表于 2005-5-9 18:16:00 | 只看该作者
    unless= IF ONT
6#
发表于 2006-1-30 18:36:00 | 只看该作者

unless=if not所以应该遵从主将从现规则

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 09:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部