- UID
- 988424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1. For the same reason, I will put HSG or even also RSM in front of Bocconi indeed........(though i will put HEC, HSG, Bocconi, SSE into the same tier in terms of reputation)
one wil have the London and the local market (e.g. Paris for HEC, Frankfurt + Zurich for HSG, Amsterdam for RSM) together for these, but not Milan or Stockholm for Bocconi and SSE.
I will put LSE slightly ahead than HEC, but the difference is again not the most important (both will get one to the door of interview if one is good, just like LSE > Warwick for London FO but this is not a key point)
The major difference between LSE and Bocconi is......LSE have a global presence, and is well regarded not only in London, but also Europe, US and APAC, but Bocconi's reputation is rather restricted in terms of location being well-regarded. (this difference is huge, but not necessarily important: imagine someone had fixed the location of interest already.....)
2. How competitive is it for the London IB networking tour?
I had once been some similar kind of networking event, and the profile of the peers are really good. A normal Chinese fresh graduate are not likely to be selected....
Note: beware that one need visa to visit UK as a Chinese national, as UK is not in the Schengen area. It can be a very big problem for interviews with short period of notice.
3. Maybe I am ignorant, but I really had never heard of Bocconi before I did my master application even though I had been studying and working in HK for ages. Only US, UK and maybe also a couple of Canadian school are well regarded here; of course I mean the good school in US/UK, like G5 of UK or similar.
4. Sometime it is really hard to find people who know someone well from the school internally cause it is quite different to know alumni from so many different school
and indeed.....even as an alumni of certain university, I seldom dare to say the school is bla bla bla.......and I bet that the opinon from each of the student of the same school can be very different.
the reason behind is: everyone is an individual, and everyone will have very different experience since the background is so different.
just say, for example, some of classmates are very smart, some are very clear what they want, but some simply don't have any idea about own career plan, some are lazy in picking the local language there, and bla bla bla......which is kind of difficult to just looking at the CV, and obsviously their experience is very different too.
What I can say is, given the tuition fee of Bocconi, 22K EUR for 2 year, I wil choose for going to IC/Warwick or even Edinburgh/Amsterdam instead if I plan to go back directly.
If I really want to stay Europe, I will still put some European school ahead of it for the location (and language also: learn Italian up to working level or not during the study?).
If I really need the schloarship.........well, why I don't just go to school in DE/CH like HSG, or even Mannheim or UZH or HU Berlin instead? I don't need to take to risk of losing the schloarship for the 2nd year.
Bocconi is good, but I don't think it is the best choice for most case. (main reason = Italy is not a place for working in finance). Back, go UK; stay, go France, Germany, Netherlands.
P.S. off topic, outsider point of view of how quantitative Bocconi MSF is:
if one look into the syllbaus, I will say there are enough hints already.
- couple of financial derivatives course are still using John Hull are the main textbook, but with some addition notes and reference as additional, i.e. a bit applied in nature, may not with solid mathematical background
- at the end it is a business school, so there are no specified course in stochastic calculus to go deep into those theortical measure stuffs.
- numerical finance are still using VBA / MATLAB, but not solely depend on scientific language like MATLAB / R, and without touching any C++
- do have course covering those advanced FE topics like IV model, IR model, but each course covers lots of topics, and I will bet that they will simply have a brief overview of them, like what are they and how they look like, but not going depth into the proof of their properties.
- tons of rubbish core course in quant point of view, like Financial Modelling, Corporate Valuation, Financial Analysis and Reporting, Investment Banking and Capital Structure Operations, Company and Financial Markets’ Law and Regulations, Risk Management and Capital Compliance.
what I mean by "correct" course is, Quantitative Finance track, ADVANCED DERIVATIVES, FIXED INCOME (ADVANCED METHODS), APPLIED NUMERICAL FINANCE, ADVANCED TOOLS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSET PRICING (CORRELATION AND DEPENDENCE MODELLING), TIME SERIES ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC-FINANCIAL DATA; which are implied vol model, interest rate model, computational finance, quantitative risk, time series indeed.
# If I am really a quant-wanna-be, I will want to select more things like Stochastic Calculus, Computitatonal Statistics / Data Mining / Meachine Learning, Bayesian Statistics, Quantitative Asset Management, more advanced course in Computational Finance and many many other interesting topic in quantitative finance. Obviously choice of course and relevant researcher are limited in Bocconi as there are no math / OR / CS department to support that.
this comment is not only for Bocconi, but any stand alone business school. MFE is interdisciplinary major, and thus the support from researcher of various departments are important. Of course location is important too (for the cooperation between the industry and the academics. (you can see that the HEC M1 QEF is cooperated with X, and ETH QF is cooperated with UZH for example.....this is the reason behind)
# of course, this type of "half-hard-half-soft" finance program are a good choice for those guy with a finance bachelor, and wanna switch to more quantitative in master. They are unlikely to be admitted to a hard core financial math master, but they stand a good chances for being admitted by these kind of flexible MSF.
|
|