ISSUE104 第二篇求各位G友拍拍拍！！

loeva

9.15越来越近了~   小猪猪终于提笔写了第二篇ISSUE~ 还望各位G友使劲儿拍拍~ 小猫这厢有礼了~ NO.104 ISSUE:To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethicaland moral standards. 提纲是issue5.5的提纲 分论点1：优秀的领袖应该具备基本的道德素养。分论点2：用最高的道德标准要求领袖只会造成其人性的扭曲。 分论点3（中心）：一个优秀的领袖除了应该具备基本的道德素养，还应该有见微知著、广纳群言的等能力。 Should effective leaders necessarily standfor the highest ethical and moral standards? A conclusion can be reached onlyafter lengthy deliberation, weighing divergent opinions from every corner. Somewould argue that such ethical and moral standards as honesty, loyalty,incorruptibility are the most essential qualities of effective leaders, butothers would state that the ability, things like prescience and determinationto change, speaks louder than the morality of effective leaders. In my view,both morality and ability are critical to a leader, and an allsided-consideration is needed.         Firstand basically, I concede that leaders should concern themselves with morality. Anintroductive example of morality of fundamental importance is Hitler, leader ofNazi Germany. We all judge him as evil because his murderous hatefulness thatled to the deaths of millions. Nazi Germany has given all of us a lesson thatas being a egregious violator of public morality, the higher the power hepossessed, the greater the harm he imposed on human.         Secondly,despite the merits of the speaker’s claim, however, I disagree with thestatement that effective leaders must maintain the highest ethical and moralstandards. For one thing, such high standards and strict requirements ofmorality stressing on leaders may eventually destroy them, leading them fallinto the opposite extreme. Most of the China’s ancient emperors are surelystrong examples could give light to this point. Mr. Yang, an emperor of Qingdynasty, accepted the most stringent education when he was young. And in eyesof people nationwide at that time, he was the model of the highest ethical andmoral standards. However, historians today have realized that Mr. Yang wasactually a savage of extravagance and license. Mr. Yang was one of manydepraved ancient China’s emperors, and it’s the rigorous ethical and moralstandards that tore them up.         Finallyand most importantly, the statement fails to take into account the fact thatmorality is only an aspect of a leader, and it’s wiser for the public toevaluate heavier on the ability than the morality of a leader. In practice, theresponsibility of an effective leader is to provide the public with adequatesocial welfare and infrastructure, and to lead the public overcome economiccrisis or political chaos. These goals can only be achieved by leaders have theoutstanding such abilities as prescience and the determination to change. Fromwhat has been discussed above, I would like to take the position that aneffective leader should concern with his morality and have necessary abilitiesto be competent. Without basic moral quality, a powerful leader may impost hugethreatens on human society, like Hitler. Without certain necessary abilities, aleader just makes a little even no contribution to the public. 感谢各位G友~欢迎大家畅所欲言，集思广益~rp多多~分数多多~

普渡哥

Fromwhat has been discussed above, ，

has用得不对。

竹林中人

举的那个中国人的例子不好，不知道的人完全不清楚你想表达什么。再就是立论文要有自己的分析，而不是简单的陈述事实或者描述存在的现象

竹林中人

另外不建议直接用现成的提纲，要有自己的想法，否则考试的时候很多人同样的提纲思路会给你一个不太理想的分数

想畅就唱

又仔细改了一遍，还希望各路看官多多指教~


中心论点：              一个优秀的领袖除了应该具备基本的道德素养，还应该有见微知著、广纳群言的等能力。
分论点1（提正）： 优秀的领袖应该具备基本的道德素养。
                              例子： 希特勒
分论点2（提反）： 2.1用最高的道德标准要求领袖会造成其人性的扭曲。
                              2.2公众容易苛责领袖而看不到他们的贡献
                              例子：克林顿
分论点3（合）：     一个优秀的领袖除了应该具备基本的道德素养，还应该有见微知著、广纳群言的等能力。

NO.104
ISSUE: To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
   Should effective leaders necessarily stand for the highest ethical and moral standards? A conclusion can be reached only after lengthy deliberation, weighing divergent opinions from every corner. Some would argue that such ethical and moral standards as honesty, loyalty, incorruptibility are the most essential qualities of effective leaders, but others would state that the ability, things like prescience and determination to change, speaks louder than the morality of effective leaders. In my view, both morality and ability are critical to a leader, and an all sided-consideration is needed.
   First and basically, I concede that leaders should concern themselves with morality. The reason why human beings is senior to animal is not only the intelligence of using tools, but also that we consider ourselves as cultural beings. A man without morality is no different from wild animals, perhaps a dangerous one. An introductive example of morality of fundamental importance is Hitler, leader of Nazi Germany. We all judge him as evil because his murderous hatefulness that led to the deaths of millions. Nazi Germany has given all of us a lesson that as being an egregious violator of public morality; the higher the power he possessed, the greater the harm he imposed on human.
   Secondly, despite the merits of the speaker’s claim, however, I disagree with the statement that effective leaders must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. For one thing, the highest ethical and moral standards exist only in religious codes or Utopia. Such high standards and strict requirements of morality stressing on leaders are impracticable and even dangerous, that may eventually destroy them, leading them fall into the opposite extreme. For another, such criteria tend to mislead the public, failing to evaluate a leader’s achievements. Present Clinton is surely a strong example giving light to this point. Although the public feel shame at his sex scandal, no one could deny Clinton’s great achievements to improve the continual stable increase of the nation. Extreme attention on scandals and highest ethical and moral standards expected by the public have caused prejudice, resulting in that we blame wrongly someone with great contribution.
Finally and most importantly, the statement fails to take into account the fact that morality is only an aspect of a leader, and it’s wiser for the public to evaluate mainly not the morality but the ability of a leader. In practice, the responsibility of an effective leader is to provide the public with adequate social welfare and infrastructure, and to lead the public overcome economic crisis or political chaos. These goals can only be achieved by leaders have the outstanding such abilities as prescience and the determination to change.
In conclusion, I would like to take the position that an effective leader should concern with his morality and have necessary abilities to be competent. Without basic moral quality, a powerful leader may impost huge threatens on human society, like Hitler. Without certain necessary abilities, a leader just makes a little even no contribution to the public.