ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 15771|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 1-37看了解释还是不明白

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-2 08:07:00 | 显示全部楼层

prep 1-37看了解释还是不明白


One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.  

(A) or

(B) nor

(C) or are

(D) nor are they

(E) nor are not

answer D

问题1:D选项,将are补出,因为be likely to do...可是为什么把they也补出了呢?白勇的书上说“平行并列结构中相同的主语可以省略(只要没有歧义)”

问题2:enough computers to use后面为什么还要补出them?

我分析问题2,补出them是避免歧义,them就近指代computers,因而不会产生enough computers to use schools的错误。不知道这样分析对否?

还有这个题目表明了they和them可以在同一句中出现,并且指代不同的对象。

请大家讨论~~

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-3 04:50:00 | 显示全部楼层
恳请NN进来解释一下~~~谢谢~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-3 15:39:00 | 显示全部楼层
In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut
prices; their wines are priced to sell, and they do.
AlienX说得没错,卖酒的这道题目中their指Italian vintners, they指的是wines,OG还是看的太潦草。
那是不是可以说they, their, them三个代词在同一句中出现时,指代对象可以不一样?
还有不明白为什么One report concludes that many schools do not have, nor are they likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively. 中为什么要有they?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-6 17:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部