ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1643|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[issue] Issue一篇,路过大侠请猛拍!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-8 15:03:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of thatnation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, orscientists.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree ordisagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure toaddress the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used tochallenge your position.

==============================================================================

字数:599

==============================================================================


The speaker avers that the general welfare of people in a nation is abetter indication of achievements of its rulers, artists or scientists to judgethe greatness of the nation. I totally concur with the speaker. Admittedly,achievements of elites in the nation are no doubt good indications of greatnessof a nation, but it's not as effective and persuasive as the well-being of thepeople in that nation. Because the welfare of people is consist of two levels,which are the material level and the mental level respectively. These twolevels of well-being can be easily judged and it's also convincing enough toindicate the greatness of nation.


There is no doubt that the achievements of elites in a nation can be agood scale to judge a nation. Sometimes, those elites are the representativesof a society. For instance, researches in military or astronautics are alwayssponsored the most by the government. Someone will say that missiles or space craftsare the things that people will not buy, so how can it function as lubricantsof the nation? Of course we denizens don't buy those things, but a new researchin these areas will threaten the countries who want to bully us. Theimprovement in military can make us feel safe and comfortable. In this sense,achievements of rulers, artists or scientists can be indications of the judgmentof a nation's greatness.


Nevertheless, indications based on achievements of elites are not aseffective as the welfare of people in that nation. We may know that the welfareof people is composed of the well-being in material and that of mentality. Inthe case of material goodness, people have the things they want to own, so theydon't need to worry about the food in their daily life. Once poverty andstarvation are eliminated, people will do things that they'd like to do, say,entertain or enjoy the union of family. Hence, people need mental satisfaction,which is still one of the parts consisting welfare. If the mental well-being ofpeople is basically satisfied, education, freedom of people and even arts mustbe at a pretty high level. This indicates that the welfare of people is morecomprehensive and wide than just judging the achievements of elites.


Furthermore, general welfare of a nation's people is much easier to beevaluated than other indicates. Grossly, which is also universally used by mostof countries in the planet is compare the GDP among nations. Real GDP isrelatively easy to calculate in a nation and also it can effectively reflectthe material satisfaction of people in that country. As for another part ofwelfare, GNH, which is Gross National Happiness index, is statistically evaluatedby social scientists each year. The higher the GNH is, the happier the peoplein that nation feel, and the successful the nation will be. On the other side,there is no such thing like GDP or GNH exist in the world to evaluateachievements of artists or scientists. Because many advanced scientificachievements are withheld by governments in case other countries will have easyaccess to it, and also everyone's judgment for art works can differ a lot. Thismeans achievements of elites in a nation cannot be easily compared betweennations while the welfare of a nation is approachable.


To sum up, although achievements of rulers, artists or scientists can beindications of the greatness of a nation, well-being of all the people seemsmuch better. No matter in which level, material or mental, the welfare ofpeople is more effective and approachable.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-1-9 11:15:41 | 只看该作者
我觉得作者在谈welfare of people的用处多于跟achievement of rulers, artists 的比较。我没有看到很明显的类比。
板凳
发表于 2013-1-10 10:47:43 | 只看该作者
Nevertheless, indications based on achievements of elites are not aseffective as the welfare of people in that nation.这里你涉及到比较,那么你就要有比较明显的比较,而不还是各说各话,应当拿出一个共同的标准比较其差异。最后,二者之间的练习也不容忽视,精英们所做的也是为了提高民众福祉
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-10 13:13:44 | 只看该作者
谢谢指点,我下次一定多思考,多联系一些这样设计比较的文章~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 19:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部