Argument 29 求解惑~~~求指导

zjs92

The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper.

   "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway， adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute， it is argued， thereby reducing rush-hour traffic."

   Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.


个人觉得这个社论这一段的节选只是单纯的提出观点，并不能说完全支持后者---单车lane他在表述上与27题不一样的地方也就是没有明确指出支持后一个观点，而且这后一个观点的提出者their应该看做是opponents。。。。

可是目前看的所有资料上都是偏向后者的
求高人指点一下。

竹林中人

我觉得你就按自己的想法写，这本身没有统一的立场，只是两个观点都质疑会不好掌控所以才一边倒