ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2105|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]TWE 070 烦请大家帮忙指点

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-1 18:33:00 | 只看该作者

[原创]TWE 070 烦请大家帮忙指点

Some people think that the automobile has improved modern life. Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Currently a discussion whether automobile has improved modern life or has caused serious problems has been generally debated by an astonishing number of people. Those who advocate that automobile has improved modern life argue that it makes our life more efficient. They maintain that automobile speeds up people's paces of life and saves a lot of time. However, this idea is strongly opposed by another group of people who conceive that automobile has caused serious problems such as heavy pollution and traffic jam. As I perceive the controversy, the viewpoint that lots of problems have been caused by automobile is more reasonable.

Among the disadvantages of automobile is it arouses heavy pollution. To illustrate this, we may point out a typical instance of Beijing, which is the capital of China. Beijing is a city having a relatively high popularity rate of private cars in China though the rate only reaches 16 percent. But the pollution caused by automobile is already very heavy. The waste gas exhausted by automobile make people feel uncomfortable when walking on the road, not mention the noises produced by them. Obviously, to a city the lighter pollution it suffers the better. So automobile does cause a considerable problem to a city’s environment.

Equally important to pollution is traffic jam. Beijing also exemplifies this. As can be seen in the statistics released by experts that the average time which needed by a person in Beijing to go to work is 42 minutes which ranks first among China's cities. Of course, the long average time is no other than the result of traffic jam. Also, personal experience leads me to conclude that. Every time I go out I cannot avoid the crowded intersection near my university. It usually cost me at least 10 minutes to cover the 500-meter distance for lots of cars, buses and pacers are stuck there. So I am fully aware of the heavy traffic jam problem brought by automobile.

When human beings accuse the pollution and traffic jam problems brought by automobile, isn't it necessary that they give some consideration to the efficiency? It is exactly strongly stressed by those who believe that automobile has improved modern life. They share the opinion that automobile decrease the time people spend on their way in spite of the jam. That is to say that people can easily go to wherever they want efficiently. But then, however compelling these cases may sound, they cannot overshadow the serious problems that automobile has brought about.

Taking into account all these factors, though the advantages that automobile enjoys are considerable, they cannot compete with the disadvantages that it give rise to. Therefore from what has been discussed, we may safely come to the conclusion that automobile has caused serious problems is a more sensible point of view.

沙发
发表于 2008-9-3 17:07:00 | 只看该作者

Some people think that the automobile has improved modern life. Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
    
    

Currently a discussion whether automobile has improved modern life or has caused serious problems has been generally debated by an astonishing number of people. Those who advocate that automobile has improved modern life argue that it makes our lives[fe] more efficient than before. They maintain that automobile speeds up people's paces of life and saves a lot of time. However, this idea is strongly opposed by another group of people who conceive that automobile has caused serious problems such as heavy pollution and traffic jam. As perceiving[e] the controversy, I think the viewpoint that lots of problems have been caused by automobile is more convincing [reasonable] than the other 

Among the disadvantages of automobile is that it causes [arouses] some serious [heavy] pollution. To illustrate this, we may cite [point out] a typical instance ,[of] Beijing, which is the capital of China. Beijing is a city having a relatively high popularity rate of private cars in China though the rate only reaches 16 percent. But the pollution caused by automobile is already very serious [heavy]. The waste gas exhausted by automobile make people [feel] uncomfortable when walking on the road. In addition, automobiles also disturbed citizens in Beijing because they also made serious noise pollution.[not mention the noises produced by them.-sentence formation is not good] Obviously, [to a city the lighter pollution it suffers the better.-Somehow this sentence is wrong.] So automobile does cause [a] some considerable problems to a city’s environment.  [passable statement]

        Equally important to pollution is traffic jam.[I disagree with your point that you regarded traffic jam as a pollution. Nevertheless, I thought of traffic jam as chaos.] Beijing can also be an example to prove the above point [exemplifies this].   One statistics [As] can be seen [in the statistics] released by experts point out the fact that people averagely spent 42 minutes on going to work. [the average time which needed by a person in Beijing to go to work is 42 minutes] Besides, people lived in Beijing spend the most time on going to work [which ranks first] among China's cities. Of course, traffic jams lead people lived in Beijing spend more time on commuting than those who in other cities.[the long average time is no other than the result of traffic jam.] Importantly [Also], my personal experience leads me to conclude that. Every time I go out, I cannot avoid the crowded intersection near my university. It usually cost my time [me] at least 10 minutes [to cover the 500-meter distance for] because lots of cars, buses and pacers are stuck there. So I am fully aware of the heavy traffic jam problem brought by automobile. [reasonable point but sentences need to polish]

        Equally important to pollution is traffic jam.[I disagree with your point that you regarded traffic jam as a pollution. Nevertheless, I thought of traffic jam as chaos.] Beijing can also be an example to prove the above point [exemplifies this].   One statistics [As] can be seen [in the statistics] released by experts point out the fact that people averagely spent 42 minutes on going to work. [the average time which needed by a person in Beijing to go to work is 42 minutes] Besides, people lived in Beijing spend the most time on going to work [which ranks first] among China's cities. Of course, traffic jams lead people lived in Beijing spend more time on commuting than those who in other cities.[the long average time is no other than the result of traffic jam.] Importantly [Also], my personal experience leads me to conclude that. Every time I go out, I cannot avoid the crowded intersection near my university. It usually cost my time [me] at least 10 minutes [to cover the 500-meter distance for] because lots of cars, buses and pacers are stuck there. So I am fully aware of the heavy traffic jam problem brought by automobile. [reasonable point but sentences need to polish]

When human beings accuse the pollution and traffic jam problems brought by automobile, isn't it necessary that they pay [give] some attentions [consideration] to the efficiency? It is exactly strongly stressed by those who believe that automobile has improved modern life. They share the opinion that automobile decrease the time people spend on their way in spite of the jam. That is to say, [that] people can easily go to wherever they want efficiency[tly]. [But then, however]Even though compelling these cases may sound, they cannot overshadow the serious problems that automobile has brought about.  

Taking into account all these factors, though the advantages that automobile enjoys are considerable, they cannot refuse [compete with] the disadvantages that it give rise to. Therefore, from what has been discussed above, [we may safely] I can come to my [the] conclusion that automobile has caused serious problems is a more sensible point of view.

 

非常奇怪,為何改完貼上後,會有些段落自動重覆還刪不掉。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-3 17:18:20编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2008-9-3 17:21:00 | 只看该作者

我評約給4分。雖然points有針對題目,但是句子組成不是很好。建議多用主動句不要用被動句,因為被動句語氣上比主動句弱。

另外很多句子看起不是很流暢,多多練習應該會有改善才對,加油。^_^;

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-3 18:53:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢啦~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-13 14:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部