2023金融时报全球MBA排名 (Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2023)

steven

2023 年 2 月 13 日，英国《金融时报》（Financial Times，以下简称“FT”）发布了 2023 MBA 百强排行榜，即刻为大家揭晓排名结果。附件中的 PDF 包含了排名各项指标的得分。

更详细的排名各项指标的得分，请下载附件 Excel 文件：

Rank 2023	Rank 2022	3 Yr Avg.	School Name	Country
1	2	-	Columbia Business School	US
2	3	2	Insead	FR/SG
3	10	6	Iese Business School	Spain
4	3	-	Harvard Business School	US
4	6	-	Stanford Graduate School of Business	US
6	13	10	SDA Bocconi School of Management	Italy
7	14	-	University of California at Berkeley: Haas	US
8	17	13	Cornell University: Johnson	US
9	5	7	Northwestern University: Kellogg	US
10	9	8	Yale School of Management	US
11	7	7	University of Chicago: Booth	US
11	19	13	Duke University: Fuqua	US
11	11	-	MIT: Sloan	US
14	26	-	UCLA Anderson School of Management	US
15	18	14	Dartmouth College: Tuck	US
16	8	9	London Business School	UK
17	11	12	HEC Paris	France
17	20	16	University of Virginia: Darden	US
19	14	15	New York University: Stern	US
20	16	14	Ceibs	China
21	25	23	University of Southern California: Marshall	US
22	40	34	IE Business School	Spain
23	22	20	University of Cambridge: Judge	UK
23	-	-	Shanghai University of Finance and Economics	China
25	21	20	National University of Singapore Business School	Singapore
26	24	24	University of Michigan: Ross	US
27	52	-	ESCP Business School	FR/IT/ES/UK/DE
28	31	25	University of Oxford: Saïd	UK
29	47	36	Rice University: Jones	US
30	34	28	Esade Business School	Spain
31	29	28	Washington University: Olin	US
32	27	25	Georgetown University: McDonough	US
32	28	26	International Institute for Management Development (IMD)	Switzerland
32	30	30	University of Washington: Michael G Foster	US
35	38	33	University of North Carolina: Kenan-Flagler	US
36	45	44	Emory University: Goizueta	US
37	34	38	Imperial College Business School	UK
38	39	38	Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore	Singapore
39	32	31	Indian School of Business	India
40	43	41	University of Florida: Warrington	US
41	59	43	HKU Business School	China
42	36	33	HKUST Business School	China
43	-	-	Michigan State University: Broad	US
44	41	39	Vanderbilt University: Owen	US
45	48	51	University of Rochester: Simon	US
46	43	40	Alliance Manchester Business School	UK
47	73	65	Edhec Business School	France
48	32	37	Fudan University School of Management	China
49	23	33	Carnegie Mellon: Tepper	US
50	46	45	University of Texas at Austin: McCombs	US
51	62	54	Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad	India
52	53	47	Indian Institute of Management Bangalore	India
53	75	62	Arizona State University: WP Carey	US
54	49	48	University of California at Irvine: Merage	US
55	57	48	Warwick Business School	UK
56	72	62	Mannheim Business School	Germany
57	85	65	University of Maryland: Smith	US
58	69	65	George Washington University	US
59	76	66	University of St Gallen	Switzerland
59	81	71	University of Texas at Dallas: Jindal	US
61	51	57	Singapore Management University: Lee Kong Chian	Singapore
61	80	76	University of Georgia: Terry	US
63	86	71	Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University	Netherlands
64	50	54	CUHK Business School	China
64	55	60	Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business	US
66	69	65	City, University of London: Bayes (formerly Cass)	UK
67	79	74	University of Toronto: Rotman	Canada
68	74	65	WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management	Germany
69	-	-	University of Massachusetts Amherst: Isenberg	US
70	64	72	Essec Business School	FR/SG
71	54	65	University of Notre Dame: Mendoza	US
71	99	90	Queen's University: Smith	Canada
73	76	68	Boston College: Carroll	US
74	96	85	Texas A & M University: Mays	US
75	63	63	Boston University Questrom School of Business	US
76	68	63	Indian Institute of Management Calcutta	India
76	89	85	EMLyon Business School	France
78	82	79	University of Pittsburgh: Katz	US
78	95	82	Durham University Business School	UK
78	-	-	Northeastern University: D'Amore-McKim	US
81	94	88	William & Mary: Mason	US
82	65	61	Sungkyunkwan University GSB	South Korea
83	90	88	McGill University: Desautels	Canada
84	92	91	Western University: Ivey	Canada
85	-	-	The Lisbon MBA Catolica | Nova	Portugal
86	-	-	Audencia	France
87	-	-	Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Business School	Ireland
88	-	-	Cranfield School of Management	UK
89	-	-	Indian Institute of Management Indore	India
90	-	-	Indian Institute of Management Lucknow	India
90	-	-	Tias Business School, Tilburg University	Netherlands
92	82	82	Brigham Young University: Marriott	US
93	-	-	Vlerick Business School	Belgium
94	-	-	University College Dublin: Smurfit	Ireland
95	65	69	Babson College: Olin	US
95	98	91	AGSM at UNSW Business School	Australia
97	-	-	Birmingham Business School	UK
98	-	-	Frankfurt School of Finance and Management	Germany
99	-	-	University of California at Davis	US
100	-	-	Eada Business School Barcelona	Spain

Table Notes

Footnotes: * KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected survey data provided for the Financial Times MBA ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the assurance process can be made by contacting Lori Huber of KPMG at lahuber@kpmg.ca. The specified audit procedures were carried out between October and November 2022. The audit date published denotes the survey for which the specified audit precedures were conducted.

** Data in this column are for information only and are not used in the rankings.

‡ No school advisory board data available.

‡‡ No citizenship data available.

Please note the Covid pandemic has limited global travel which has an impact on the international course experience rank.

Some 154 points separate the top programme, at Columbia, from the school ranked 100. The schools are divided into four tiers. Business schools in tiers l and ll score above the average for the cohort, and tiers lll and lV are below it. The difference in scores between schools ranked consecutively is greater within tiers l and lV than in tiers ll and lll. Tier l includes 18 schools from Columbia to Virginia's Darden. Tier ll includes schools from New York's Stern, ranked 19, to Edhec at 47. Tier lll, headed by Fudan, spans schools ranked 48 to 81. Tier lV includes schools from Sungkyunkwan at 82 to Eada at 100.

Download the full ranking as a Excel

游客，如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

steven

引用自：https://www.ft.com/mba-method

This year’s Global MBA Ranking includes some important changes. The aim is to retain a focus on outcomes, while placing more emphasis on tracking how the education offered reflects diversity and sustainability — and ultimately fosters greater societal impact by business.

Outcome measures still account for more than half of the total weighting. Salary levels, three years after completion, and wage increases, from before the MBA to now, remain central. But the weighting of salary criteria is reduced from 40 per cent to 32 per cent to give greater emphasis to other factors. Value for money — a proxy for social mobility, which takes into account study costs, financial aid and earnings post MBA — has been increased to a weighting of 5 per cent.

The ability to speak languages other than English at graduation has been dropped as a ranking criterion. So has alumni recommendations of other business schools, while their assessments of the value of school networks — a key aspect of an MBA — receives a 4 per cent weighting. Other outcome measures — employment at three months after completion, the quality of the career service, and alumni career progress — remain.

Global MBA Ranking 2023

View the ranking here. Register for the February 22 Spotlight on MBA online event, and read the MBA report

The weightings for gender parity and international diversity of students and faculty are equally weighted at 3 per cent — as is a new measure of the diversity of employment backgrounds of students. Since many choose to stay in the country where they studied, the weight for international mobility has been reduced.

New emphasis has been given to the environment. Fresh credit is given for schools providing a recent public carbon emissions report complying with international standards, and also for setting near-term zero emission targets. Only foreign study visits and placements lasting at least one month are counted towards the international course experience rank, to penalise shorter-term international travel.

The updated methodology
This FT MBA ranking features 100 of the world’s best full-time MBA programmes. A total of 142 schools took part in the ranking process for the 2023 edition. All participating schools meet the FT’s entry criteria and are accredited by Equis or the AACSB.

The FT surveys alumni three years after completing their MBA. For schools to enter the ranking calculations, the FT usually requires that a minimum of 20 per cent of alumni reply to the survey, with at least 20 fully completed surveys.

This year, because of disruption from Covid, the FT considered schools with a lower response rate. A total of 7,134 alumni from the class of 2019 completed our survey — an overall response rate of 36 per cent.

The ranking has 21 categories. Alumni responses inform eight criteria that together contribute 56 per cent of its weight. Twelve criteria are calculated from school data, accounting for 34 per cent of the ranking. KPMG audits a number of schools every year. The remaining criterion, the research rank, counts for 10 per cent.

Alumni-informed criteria are based on the data collected over three years. Responses from the 2023 ranking survey carry 50 per cent of total weight and those from 2022 and 2021, 25 per cent each. If only two years of data are available, the weighting is split 60:40 if data are from 2023 and 2022, or 70:30 if they are from 2023 and 2021. For salary figures, the weighting is 50:50 for two years’ data.

The first two alumni criteria are average income three years after completion and salary increase from before the MBA to now, each weighted at 16 per cent. For the latter, half of the weight applies to the absolute increase and half to the percentage rise (published). Current salaries are converted to US dollars using IMF international purchasing power parity rates.

The highest and lowest salaries are removed from each school, to calculate a normalised average. Finally, salaries are weighted to reflect differences between different sectors.

“Value for money” for each school is calculated by dividing its average alumni salary three years after completion by the MBA’s total cost, including tuition, lost salary, opportunity cost and other expenses. Any scholarship assistance given to alumni is subtracted from the total.

The FT also collects information from schools on their current faculty, newly enrolled students and the latest completing class. School criteria include the diversity of staff, board members and students by gender, citizenship and the MBA’s international reach. For gender criteria, schools with a 50:50 composition score highest.

The research rank is based on the number of articles by full-time faculty in 50 internationally recognised academic and practitioner journals. The rank combines the number of publications from January 2020 to July 2022, with the number weighted relative to faculty size.

For the 2023 ranking, we have made some changes in response to feedback from schools. For example, the total weighting for alumni salaries is now 32 per cent, not 40.

The environmental, social and governance rank is based on the proportion of teaching hours from core courses including ESG topics, but now includes time spent on instructing how organisations can reach net zero.

There are three new categories. One measures the quality of alumni networks. The second is student sector diversity, which looks at the range of employment sectors candidates have worked in before starting their MBA. Finally, we added a school carbon footprint rank.

We removed two categories: first, the number of languages required on graduation, excluding English; second, alumni recommendations of schools other than their own from which they would recruit MBA graduates.

The MBA ranking is a relative listing. Schools are ranked against each other by calculating a Z-score for each criterion. The Z-score is a statistic that shows where a score lies in relation to the mean. These scores are then weighted as outlined in the ranking key and added together for a final score.

After removing schools that did not meet the response rate threshold from the alumni survey, a first version is calculated. The school at the bottom is removed and a second version is calculated and so on until we reach the top 100. The top 100 schools are ranked accordingly to produce the final list.

Key (weights for ranking criteria are shown in brackets as a percentage)
Salary today**: average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent. This figure is not used in the ranking. #

Weighted salary (16): average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent (see methodology below), with adjustment for variations between sectors. #

Salary increase (16): average difference in alumni salary from before the MBA to now. Half of this figure is calculated according to the absolute salary increase and half according to the percentage increase relative to pre-MBA salary. #

Value for money (5): calculated using salary today, course length, tuition and other costs, including lost income during the MBA. #

Career progress (3): calculated according to changes in the level of seniority and the size of the organisation alumni work in now, compared with before their MBA. #

Aims achieved (4): the extent to which alumni fulfilled their stated goals or reasons for doing an MBA. #

Alumni network rank (4): effectiveness of the alumni network for career opportunities, starting companies, gaining new ideas, recruiting staff and giving event information (such as career-related talks), as rated by alumni.

Careers service (3): effectiveness of the school careers service for career counselling, personal development, networking events, internship search and recruitment, as rated by alumni. #

Employed at three months (2): percentage of the most recent completing class which found employment or accepted a job offer within three months of completing their studies. The figure in brackets is the percentage of the class for which the school was able to provide employment data and is used to calculate the school’s final score. §

Sector diversity rank (3): calculated according to the diversity of sectors the students worked in at the time of admission, before the MBA.

Female faculty (3): percentage of female faculty.

Female students (3): percentage of female students on the MBA.

Women on board (1): percentage of female members on the school’s advisory board.

International faculty (3): calculated according to the diversity of faculty by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their location of employment — the figure published in the table.

International students (3): calculated according to the diversity of current MBA students by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from the location in which they study — the figure in the table.

International board (1): percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the location in which the school is based.

International mobility (5): based on alumni citizenship and the locations where they worked before their MBA, on completion and three years after. #

International course experience (3): calculated according to whether the most recent completing class carried out exchanges and internships, lasting at least a month, in countries other than where the school is based. In-person, virtual and hybrid experiences are included. Due to travel restrictions caused by the pandemic, ranks for this category may not be a true reflection of the overseas opportunities that schools can offer. Prospective students should contact business schools to check if they offer study trips and internships abroad. §

Faculty with doctorates (5): percentage of full-time faculty with a doctoral degree.

FT research rank (10): calculated according to the number of articles published by current full-time faculty members in 50 selected academic and practitioner journals between January 2020 and July 2022. The FT50 rank combines the absolute number of publications with the number weighted relative to the faculty’s size.

Carbon footprint rank (4): calculated using the net zero target year for carbon emissions set by the university or school, and a publicly available carbon emissions audit report within the last three years.

ESG and net zero teaching rank (3): proportion of teaching hours from core courses including ethics, social, environmental issues and climate solutions that can enable organisations to reach net zero.

Overall satisfaction**: average evaluation by alumni of the course, scored out of 10. After alumni answered various questions about their MBA experience, they were asked to rate their overall satisfaction, on a 10-point scale. This figure is not used in the ranking.

安筱然

Mark一下！               

lapxhs

新的排名出来了呀 HAAS好高

haodi

感谢分享！               

lores

感谢分享

Cali666

1

lancer-wang

顶

ANEI

Mark一下！               

早睡早起rae

谢谢楼主