小猫的作文贴，5.11二战！！！！

牛奶泡小猫

之前一直没有坚持练作文，写了几篇也没有放到CD上，今天把之前都贴上来，求指导。
现在感觉自己的作文句法超低级，也没什么好词，哎呀呀，考场紧张就感觉什么都憋不出来了啊！！！！

牛奶泡小猫

2012-08-17

Do you agree or disagree with the statement:

Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors.

The issue whether universities should pay more attention to the school facilities or hire eminent professors has been discussed heatedly due to the gradually significance of education. Some people claim that schools should use their money to provide a comfortable atmosphere to all of teachers and student through purchasing advanced teaching equipments. However, these folks overstate the importance of facilities in the universities. In my opinion, high-quality teachers play the more vital role than expensive equipments when taking the students' realistic situations into consideration.

Students are more influenced by their teachers rather than no-life devices. This can be explained by the reason why students go to universities. They want to get enough nutrition from these courses which they take, and the only people who can convey and impart various knowledge to students are teachers. So it is obvious that the quality of teachers is of great importance. They can not only present the new knowledge to student which can broaden their knowledge scope, but also make students interested in particular field and then study further. That can be illustrated best by the common phenomenon that millions of students prepare for the college entrance examination in order to enter famous universities, such as Peking University. That is because the school hires excellent professors as their staff.

Also, inviting well-known professors to the universities can benefit students a lot, in terms of their future. As we all know, famous professors have been through up-and-down and finally become experts in their own areas. They used to work hard in order to go to their dream schools; they once felt confused about their life due to the various and infinite lure in life which exert bad influence on their school life and job choices; they sometimes even desperated completely because they find the difficulty of being innovative in academia. However, their experiences can be wealth for students if professors share them with students. No matter whether youngsters want to be teachers or not, they can take lessons and get support from their teachers' unique and meaningful life, and then regard them as their guidelines for their life.

Admittedly, good facilities can make contribution to students' daily life and enable them enjoy their precious four-year life. But as I mentioned, considering the benefit to students brought from noted professors, it is crystal clearly that the administrators of universities should put prompting the quality of teachers in the first place. As least it seems to me, it is a responsible behavior of universities.

牛奶泡小猫

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

Students are more interested in politics today than those in the past.

In modern society, along with the dramatic development of society, politics has caught many folks’ sights. The issue whether students are more concerned with politics than those in the past has been discussed heatedly. Some people acclaim that youngsters are more likely to focus on the present politics such as the cooperative relationship between China and America. However, these people fail to take account the increasingly various ways of entertainment and students' situations. In my view, nowadays, students pay less attention to politics than their parents and grandparents when they were still young.

To begin with, no one can deny that fact that besides politics there are something more attractive to students, such as computers and the Internet which are the products of advanced technology. Through the two things, students can watch movies, chat with their friends, hop online and etc.. However, in the past, the means of relaxing were quite rare. Take my mother as an example. When she was a high school student, the only way to entertain was watching movies and the opportunities of doing that were limited so she could even recall the spots of each film which she had seen. Without so many choices for her to have fun, she began to realize some politic events and then was absorbed in them like other students. If they had gained more chances available to relax, I am sure that they would have paid such attention to politics.

What's more, although our country expects students to get more involved in politics, students show lower interest in it due to their heavy school work. At present, the competition between students become gradually violent which causes them pour most of their energy on study rather than politics. That is, students have to face countless examinations whose typical represent is college entrance examination, because their performance on those tests play an essential role to decide whether they can have a promising future or not. On the other hand, students have a lot homework to do every day, which takes up their time, so it is impossible for them to concern with politics, let alone be interested in it.

From the discussion above, it is crystal clear that today students express less interest in politics than those in the past. For one perspective, they are more like to relax through computers and the Internet, the fruits brought by modern technology rather than pay attention to politics like their parents. For another, students have to study on various subjects and participate different examinations, so being interested in politics is a harsh demand for them. So it is superficial to draw the conclusion that modern students are more interested in politics than those lived in the past.

牛奶泡小猫

In modern school, for students, showing various presentations to other students or teachers is an unavoidable tendency. It can not only let students practice their speaking skills, but also encourage them to organize their opinions in a concise way. And when it comes to whether students should prepare for an important presentation immediately as they receive the assignment or spend some time to think of it, different students show various views. As for me, I think that it is unnecessary for students to begin preparation for the presentation right way.

To begin with, no one can deny the fact that students need to spend some time to think before they start. For one thing, they should decide their topic and surf the Internet or go to the library to gather useful information for the theme, such as protecting the environment or releasing students' burden on daily homework. As we all know, once the topic is decided, it will be relatively difficult to change, because a lot of time and energy has been poured on it.  This can be best illustrated by my own experience. My teacher asked me to give a lecture on behalf of the whole students, and I was so honor that I determined the theme without thinking too much. However, what I encountered later was that there limited and inadequate information on the Internet as well as in the school library, so I had to modify my topic under pressure.

What's more, besides the content of the presentation, how to organize those materials which have been collected is another essential thing on which students concentrate. Frame is the skeleton of body, so without a well-planned framework, the speaker cannot show the presentation's content clearly and understandably to audience. What's more, the earlier students begin their preparations of the presentations, the later they will finish. Although it seems that students who take action at once after they accept the task are more serious about it, they are likely to lose enthusiasm quickly, and show a tend to delay doing that task again and again.  

All in all, admittedly, students can have more time to amend their presentations if they work on the presentation day by day, and finish the first version of it earlier. But disadvantages of starting preparation at once obviously outweitgh its advantages. So I am sure that if students want to have an excellent performance and give a good impression for teachers and students, they would better have an overview of it before taking action.

牛奶泡小猫

Which of the following would you change to improve your health:

1. The kind of food you eat 2. The amount of exercise 3. The amount of stress



Healthy problem as an unavoidable phenomenon brought by the developing society has been discussed heatedly since it was raised up, for more and more people suffer substantial illnesses and many of them witness some around them pass away due to aliments. When it comes to the available way to alter the serious condition, different people hold various perspectives towards it. But all of those methods can be classified into three types, which are altering the diet, adjusting the amount of exercise and controlling stress. When taking my personal situation into consideration, the second is my preference.


First and foremost, like most students, I do not get adequate exercise due to my heavy task of studying. If I spend more than eight hours in class or at desk table, headache usually bothers me, and my neck gets uncomfortable. And after repeating doing this daily, I get cough frequently and feel too tired to focus on my study sometimes, which are symptoms of hurting immune system. So I went to see a doctor, what I was told is nothing but taking exercise as much as possible. From my own experience, it is crystal clear that I need to pay more attention to increasing the amount of exercise, not just study all the time. But in order to persist exercising, I will try to find a person who enjoy exercising in company with me.


What's more, taking more exercise is more available and easier than changing the kind of food I assume. For one perspective, I am living in my university which is far from my home. So I have to eat meals served in canteen, that is to say, choosing some typical types of food to eat is unrealistic for me. In the contrary, there are numerous exercising ways for me to choose. Not only can I run on the playground, but also I can swim in the pool.


Admittedly, I have stress brought by my study and life. But it has not made bad influence on me, instead, a small amount of stress enables me have motivation to do something challenging but unavoidable, such as participating in examinations. Also, doing exercising is a good opportunity for me to reduce the stress. When I am playing soccer with other classmates, I will sweat and forget the study temporarily, letting the burdens out in my heart.


In the end, it is necessary to mention that different people have different preferences to improve their health condition. But considering my current situation, I decide to augment the amount of exercising. If you want to prompt your physical health and own an energetic mental, just choose a proper approach to achieve these goals. If you have chosen one, why not take action as quickly as possible?

牛奶泡小猫

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The opinions of celebrities, such as certain entertainment and athletes, are more important for younger people that older people.

Have you ever been crazy about some famous singers? Have you ever been influenced by them, like pop singers or famous athletes? Have you ever accepted their opinions which indirect your daily life? As a young people, your answer might be yes. However, are older people affected by celebrities in the same way? In fact, celebrities cannot show an important influence on older people easily. But when it comes to youth, things will change.

To begin with, older people are less easily influenced by celebrities，because they have more precious experience than the young, which help them set up their own opinions. Take my grandfather as an example. He experienced the hard period from 1966 to 1976. Due to many complicated political reasons, he had to say something against his heart, which got other people in troubles. He felt guilty about his behaviors, so he sets up mind that never hurt others no matter what is going on. In contrast, some celebrities nowadays frequently say something aimed at abusing others, and their incorrect actions and opinions are copied by young people who are still young and do not know what can do and what cannot.

What's more, more and more young people feel confused when facing their current conditions, including opportunities and challenges, however the old people pay more attention to their health or daily diet. So it is obvious to draw the conclusion that young people are influenced more than old ones by celebrities' viewpoints. When they are in front of some chances to improve their abilities or broaden their horizon, they need learn constructive suggestions from celebrities as fine examples. When they are experiencing quiet difficult time, like college entrance examination, they usually turn to famous people for help, which means they can get positive energy from them and try their best to overcome these unavoidable difficulties. In the contrary, old people face different situations from the young. One of the most essential things they want to do is keeping healthy and staying from illnesses. So they are less influenced by celebrities.

From the discussion above, it is crystal clear that the opinions from well-known people show different influence on the young and the old. For one perspective, old people have already build their way of thinking towards the world, but young people are still young and lacking in personal experience. For another, what they are concerned is different respectively. While the young need celebrities' views to continue their life, the old just focus on being in good physical condition. So it is simply superficial to say that famous people's statements have the same effect on people nowadays.

牛奶泡小猫

Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Governments and companies should share their scientific discoveries with others/ the government and businesses should not keep any discoveries in secret.
12:14_13:03


The protection of scientific discoveries brought by the governments and companies has been a heated issue since it was raised up, however, people hold quiet different opinions towards it. Some people believe that it is necessary for them to share those scientific findings to the public, but some object it including some research foundations. As for me, I support the action of sharing. Then I will explain my statement with three specific points.


To begin with, the behavior of sharing academic findings is encouraged in the society. For the authorities which work on the same field, the new findings made by other organizations can not only inspire them to create new ideas, but also use them to support their own studies or amend them. For the ordinary people, governments and companies sharing their discoveries can set up a good model and make contribution to appeal more students to devote themselves into researching. When my Uncle was young, he set up mind to become a useful researchers working for the aerospace departments like Deng Jiaxian and Qian Xuesen. As we all know, both of them share their findings to the physics area.


Moreover, they will be honored for selflessness and enjoy the sense of achievement. Take Yuan Longping for example. He is a world-known Chinese biologist who spreads the technology of producing high-quality cross bred rice to other countries, and be respected by these countries, such as Vietnam. Without his contribution, the globe has to face the challenge due to the increasingly growing population and the rapidly decreasing amount of land. Without his generosity, some countries will be unstable and risky, for their people feed on rice whereas they cannot produce adequate rice by themselves. It is easy to imagine how proud Yuan will be when he witnesses that his achievement makes incredible contribution to the whole world.


Admittedly, being afraid of their results copied by others is the main reason that governments and companies are unwilling to expose their findings to the society. However, as time goes by, the government will pay more attention to protecting scientific findings, by various accesses, such as publishing the law of it. Bear in mind, with the development of education, people will reset their attitude towards researches correctly. All of these improvements as I describe will resolve these worries and distrust.


Finally, I would like to emphasize that government should not keep their findings secretly, as I mentioned, sharing scientific fruits has more positive effects than that of negative. So, as these governments and organizations, why not share these findings and benefit the world and people?

牛奶泡小猫

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Talented people’s leadership is born by natural and can’t be learned by people.




19:04_19:46
Leadership as a outcome with the development of society has been discussed heatedly since it became a commonplace phenomenon. Most people admire the person who has leadership to control a group working towards a direction, and they sometimes disscuss whether leadership can be cultivated or just born by nature. In my opinion, people can learn leadership with proper methods if they want.


One characteristics of leadership is having the motivation to be a leader. If a person has no interest in being a leader, he will not cooperate with group members well, let alone be willing to take the responsible of being a leader. However, if a person admires to become a leader, things will change. Take my brother Jim as an example. He used to be a naught boy in his class, however, after he used an iPhone 4, he got interested in the Apple Company, especially its creator Steve Jobs. With the realization of Jobs being deeper, he set up mind to become a good leader as Steve. What surprised me a lot is that he began to study hard and participate in different clubs and associations step by step, and then became the chairman of the Student Union of his university.


What's more, the most useful way of having leadership is to study other excellent leaders as models and try to be a leader as much as possible. Different leaders have their own experiences and viewpoints towards leadership. Although some of them are not useful for those who want to be a leadership, they can inspire and encourage them to think of what is leadership, how to build the leadership and many other questions. Of course, a person who has good demand of theories of leadership needs practice to become a real leader. So it is necessary for him to seize the opportunity of being a leader as much as possible to accumulate some precious experience.


From the discussion above, it is crystal clear to draw the conclusion that leadership can be learned by people. For one thing, having the desire of becoming a leader and having leadership are the preparation for those who want to be leaders. For another, people can learn from other leaders and then take practice in daily life if they want to build up leadership. So it is simply superficial to say that leadership is limited to talented people, and it is born by birth.

牛奶泡小猫

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office.

Have you ever imagined that one day you can work at home instead of being in the office? Don't think that I am kidding. In fact, some people have already done as what I mentioned due to the new working way via computers，the Internet and telephones. However, some people do not support the style of working, and they insist that people should work in the office with their colleagues. Contrary to the opinion of those people is my heartfelt and considerate viewpoint that working at home has more advantages than in the office, and several points in different dimensions will be demonstrated and explained to testify my hypothesis.

First and foremost, no one can deny the fact that working at home really saves the employees' time which used to be spent on travelling between their offices and houses. In most cases, companies require their workers to arrive at offices at eight in the morning, and they regard it as an important factor to judge the amount of bonus to be given to employees. So, in order to earn the money, many people have to get up at about six o'clock. After a quick breakfast, they rush to the subway station or just drive by themselves. They have to bare the crowded subways, or busy traffic. What's more, sometimes they are late for work for the transportation problems. It not only makes them feel exhausted, but also bring criticism to them from their strict superiors. But all of these unhappy experiences can be solved if workers can stay at home to deal with their work. And I am sure that everyone will have more energy to concentrate on their daily tasks.

Another obvious advantage brought by working at home can save money for both employers and employees. As we all know, the rent of offices are expensive because most of them are located in the business center of the city. So, if workers work at home, companies do not need to spend money on working places, let alone the cost of electricity and water. And in the term of workers, they can cook for themselves at home. For one thing, the food made at home is cheaper healtier and more safe than those sold at restaurants. For another, they have the right to decide their dishes.

Admittedly, working at home prevents workers dealing with problems face to face, which may slows down the process of solving problems. And, it cuts down the opportunities of enjoying social activities. But, as I mentioned in the first paragraph, people can work with others through the Internet. With the help of it, they can exchange opinions by making a phonecall，online chatting or sharing information through emails or MSN. It is crystal clear that, from those processes, the work efficiency will not be disturbed, and the relationship between others will not be hurt. In addition, working at home allow people to deal with their family affairs more conveniently.

In the end, I would like to emphasis that with the incredible development of science, working at home will become a trend in the world. When taking the situations of workers and employers into consideration, certainly, working at home has an advantage over working in the office. Well, if possible, why not have a try?

牛奶泡小猫

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Two people cannot be friends with each other if one has more money than the other.


Have you ever made friends with anyone who is much richer or poorer than you? In fact, when facing it, different people show various opinions towards it. Some people think it is possible that two people who have opposite amount of asset to make friends, however, some people disagree with that statement. In my viewpoint, the amount of money is not the only factor which can decide whether two persons can make friends or not.


To begin with, interest is one of the most important factors which can make a rich man and a poor man be friends with each other. With the same interest, such as classical music or reading traditional books, they can spend time on exchanging opinions about those topics. With the mutual hobby, they can share their precious belongings with the other. Once I asked my cousin Jack who majored in History, why he can make friends with a poor girl just because both of them loved reading history books. He answered me that although their status were not the same, they can discuss heatedly about a famous historical event more than three hours sometimes. What's more, his friend Amy helped him a lot in writing history research paper and made contributions for him to get the highest GPA in his grade.


In addition, the two persons having different amount money can benefit from making friends and sharing own experiences with the other. As we all know, people spend most of their time with folks who are similarly rich or poor with them, due to the same backgrounds and values. However, if they remain living in such a limited surroundings, their horizons will not be broadened. When the rich enjoy attending dinner parties, playing golf, driving their personal helicopters, is it necessary for them to know that some people still cannot make a living? Making friends with the poor and realizing their experiences can make the rich be friendless rather than indifferent to other people. For the poor, with the help and experiences from their rich friends, they will overcome obstacles standing in their ways of changing their lives. And when they feel hopeless, they can encourage themselves by recalling their rich friends' history of struggling.


In the end, I would like to emphasis that a rich man and a poor man can make friends with each other due to the same interest and different but helpful experiences. In other words, it is simply superficial to say that these people cannot be friends just because they have different amount of money.