ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11194|回复: 61
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13-SC106 A选项 - 主谓离得有点远?

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
#
发表于 2013-1-17 12:45:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
107.Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which
can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost
any substance without destroying it,
is finding uses in
medicine, archaeology, and criminology.



(A)Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,
a technique called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

(B)Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,
having the ability to analyze the chemical
elements in almost any substance without
destroying it, a technique called proton-induced
X-ray emission

(C)A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

(D)A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which has the ability to analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
quickly and without destroying it,
(E)      A technique that was originally developed for
detecting air pollutants and has the ability to
analyze the chemical elements in almost any
substance quickly and without destroying the
substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,


虽说比较下来,我能够认可

A选项

作为正确答案。
但我还是有个小小的疑惑~
一般来说主谓之间隔着千山万水的,都会认为是错的,而这里加上了which引导的非限制性条件状语从句,就对了~
请问什么情况下,主谓不可以隔着千山万水,而什么时候又可以呢?


谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
61#
发表于 2015-9-24 17:25:04 | 只看该作者
在别的帖子看到的,由erkuai9526提供,我从曼哈顿直接贴过来哈
The difference is in the placement of the various phrases.

A: "(opening modifier), (noun) (modified by necessary descriptive phrase), which" - in this structure, which refers to the noun. Note that the few words right after "technique" are simply the name of that technique. These words ("technique called proton-induced X-ray emission") collectively make up the extended noun phrase to which "which" refers. The single-word noun is technique but the other words are necessary to understand what technique we're talking about.

C: "(Noun) (modifier), (modifer), which" - in this structure, we've separated what had been the necessary descriptive phrase from the noun, so it is no longer a part of any extended noun phrase. As a result, the "which" in this case really does only apply to "emission" rather than to a "technique called emission" b/c "a technique called emission" as a simple noun phrase, is no longer part of the sentence.
60#
发表于 2015-9-24 17:17:01 | 只看该作者
stella要去英国 发表于 2013-3-3 22:35
我很好奇C为什么不对,A的which 怎么就不会修饰emissions了?

同问,明明两个which都是跟在emission,后面的,不是应该就近修饰emission吗
59#
发表于 2015-9-22 18:12:51 | 只看该作者
同疑惑,根据OG上的解释,为何同样都是“...emission, which..."结构,只有C选项“relative clause introduced
by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission.” A选项就没有which修饰emission的嫌疑?

另外不太同意之前某楼的童鞋说的portion-induced X-ray emission是句子主语,它是作为called...开头的noun modifier的一个组成部分而存在,a technique应该才是句子主语&which所要修饰的先行词。

58#
发表于 2015-9-22 16:44:51 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
57#
发表于 2015-6-10 10:26:01 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
56#
发表于 2015-6-9 19:26:56 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
55#
发表于 2015-5-24 17:49:03 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
54#
发表于 2015-5-22 10:39:55 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
53#
发表于 2014-12-15 11:16:14 | 只看该作者
看一下答案
52#
发表于 2014-12-12 13:25:26 | 只看该作者
夹心修饰很形象啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 07:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部