ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a review of 2,000 studies of human behavior that date back to the 1940s, two Swiss psychologists, declaring that since most of the studies had failed to control for such variables as social class and family size, none could be taken seriously.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 9753|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 13 SC 第一题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-4 04:26:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
题目:
In a review of 2,000 studies of human behavior that date back to the 1940s, two Swiss psychologists, declaring that since most of the studies had failed to control for such variables as social class and family size, none could be taken seriously.

(A) psychologists, declaring that since most of the studies had failed to control for such variables as social class and family size,
(B)psychologists, declaring that most of the studies failed in not controlling for such variables like social class and family size, and
(C) psychologists declared that since most of the studies, having failed to control for such variables as social class and family size,
(D)psychologists declared that since most of the studies fail in controlling for such variables like social class and family size,
(E) In a review of 2,000 studies of human behavior that date back to the 1940s, two Swiss psychologists declared that since most of the studies had failed to control for variables such as social class and family size, none could be taken seriously.

我没想通从句为什么要用过去完成时,难道不应该用现在完成时吗?
谢谢各位大神了
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
18#
发表于 2016-10-15 06:05:16 | 只看该作者
lifeforest 发表于 2013-1-20 02:58
借用一下你的帖子,看不懂最后一个comma是为什么?“, none could be taken seriously.” 这个算状语?(E)  ...

同意!               
17#
发表于 2016-6-29 11:30:36 | 只看该作者
lifeforest 发表于 2013-1-20 02:58
借用一下你的帖子,看不懂最后一个comma是为什么?“, none could be taken seriously.” 这个算状语?(E)  ...

同意!               
16#
发表于 2013-8-15 18:16:15 | 只看该作者
miyini 发表于 2013-8-6 16:36
fail in not controlling for, 不等于 fail to control。 fail 的意思是做什么事失败了,本身已经包含了 ...

fail 已经暗含失败了意思,但是不能说加了not就是双重否定吧,只能是说很awkward吧。

就像中文里你不能说书香门第之家因为书香门第已经包括了家的概念。
15#
发表于 2013-8-8 17:31:30 | 只看该作者
miyini 发表于 2013-8-6 16:36
fail in not controlling for, 不等于 fail to control。 fail 的意思是做什么事失败了,本身已经包含了 ...

谢谢!懂了!
14#
发表于 2013-8-6 16:36:52 | 只看该作者
miyini 发表于 2013-8-6 16:31
fail in dong , fail in attempt to do;   fail to do sth

fail in not controlling for, 不等于 fail to control。 fail 的意思是做什么事失败了,本身已经包含了一层否定意思,如果再加一个not,相当于双重否定, 意思就成了succeed in controlling, 与题目意思相反,所以是错误的。
13#
发表于 2013-8-6 16:31:06 | 只看该作者
圆小栗 发表于 2013-6-30 09:05
再借用一下你的帖~谢谢啦
og的解释没有很懂,里面有 failed in not controlling for...is awkward and does ...

fail in dong , fail in attempt to do;   fail to do sth
12#
发表于 2013-8-2 11:51:14 | 只看该作者
xunzlyx 发表于 2013-8-2 10:06
说点题外话,关于你说到”正确用法不应该是such as...么?会有such...as...这种用法么?“

在中国中学课 ...

嗯,我后来也做到多个关于such...as....分开的题目。这样的用法也算对的。。。受高中语法影响太大。。。以为是固定词组不能拆开呢。。= =
11#
发表于 2013-8-2 10:06:14 | 只看该作者
圆小栗 发表于 2013-6-30 09:05
再借用一下你的帖~谢谢啦
og的解释没有很懂,里面有 failed in not controlling for...is awkward and does ...

说点题外话,关于你说到”正确用法不应该是such as...么?会有such...as...这种用法么?“

在中国中学课本,基本上看到的such as 都是紧挨着出现的,于是乎也许在OG里,第一次看到such as 是分开的,以前没有看到过,而且事先潜意识里就被误导觉得such as 一定要连在一起才对。我觉得这种想法太武断了,我们以前学到的,可以说是对的,但不代表和它不同的就一定是错的。
10#
发表于 2013-7-31 15:44:39 | 只看该作者
圆小栗 发表于 2013-6-30 09:05
再借用一下你的帖~谢谢啦
og的解释没有很懂,里面有 failed in not controlling for...is awkward and does ...

同问 有解答了么?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 05:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部