prep 08 207题，关于with独立主格的夹心修饰，求助！！！NN快来！！

二楼往下掉

207.    (30188-!-item-!-188;#058&005337)    (T-4-Q30)
Unlike the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which carried sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries, a permanently orbiting space station will have to generate its own electricity.
A. the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which carried sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries,
B. the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights,
C. the short flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which enabled them to carry sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries,
D. the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, which were capable of carrying sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights,
E. the flights of the shuttle and earlier spacecraft, whose shortness allowed them to carry sufficient power in fuel cells and batteries,

答案是D没问题，我的问题是前辈们在prep中的解释式独立主格夹心修饰了，但是with独立主格表伴随不是只能做状语么，那么就不存在会向前修饰the shuttle and earlier spacecraft的情况了吧？只能伴随后边的will have to那为什么夹心了呢？或者是我对独立主格的理解有偏差了？求解释！！谢谢！！

冲鸭冲鸭歆歆子

谢谢～

W...

请问，我在Manhattan prep帖子里看到，有人问Ron B的with是否有歧义，Ron回答并没有。
source：https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/sc-unlike-the-short-flights-of-the-shuttle-and-t8034-45.html
有人提问：I read a comment in other forums which said-
Other than redundancy, B is also wrong because the position of " with sufficient enough power in fuel cells and batteries for their short flights" leads to ambiguity.
Because "with xxxx" then could be modifying either the shuttle and earlier spacecraft or a permanently orbiting space station
Is that ambiguity a solid ground to eliminate this choice?

Ron的回答：^^ no, the meaning of that modifier is obvious enough.

请解答，谢谢！

jlikel

想问一下，这道题正解D， 为什么用的是过去式were。 这样就与未划线部分will be 将来时形成了一个时态上的空格（只有过去式和将来时）。我判断BD的时候就因为时态吧D 删掉了，求大神解释？时态可以这样空格嘛？

lunvs

with +n +介词不一定就是独立主格结构哦，只有作状语成分时才是；它还可以作定语修饰前面的名词。
这里夹心，既可以修饰前面名词，又可以修饰后面句子，所以歧义了

DUKB24

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-769740-1-1.html

看6楼的例子和解释

HarrisZheng

unlike Mike，with a flower at hand， he is more handsome  (Mike with a flower？or he？   不是特别好的例子。。不过足以说明）

so，which part do you think the with modifier should modify？


If you change the sentence


unlike Mike with a flower at hand，I am more handsome      （you don't have comma here）          so it is clear that Mike has the flower, not HE

a pair of comma set off the with modifier，you do not know which part it should attach ，so this structure creates ambiguity

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/8/27 18:34:03)

恩，你的例子我明白了，谢谢！！

-- by 会员 二楼往下掉 (2012/9/4 19:15:23)

在新prep1-190 对独立主格的解释中说
独立主格，表示伴随，所以必须修饰主谓宾结构，而非主系表结构

但在新prep1-232题中
The Acoma and Hopi are probably the two oldest surviving Pueblo
communities, both dating back at least a thousand years.

both dating
both of which have dated
and each has dated
and each one dating
E. each one of which date

答案是A。
并且解释中说  both dating 独立主格在此表示补充说明，与each型独立主格同一原理。
此句前面部分不是 主系表结构么？和prep1-190对独立主格的解释矛盾呀 ？

-- by 会员 默默楚 (2012/10/2 19:58:36)

我讲几点

1 语法笔记也是中国同学写的 有可能存在错误
2 本贴中你举得两例 语法比记的解释正确
3 要理解 不要死背 主系表 后面独立主格自然不可能是表示伴随 主句都没实意动词 怎么伴随 自然就是补充说明的作用 但是主系表后面不表示伴随并不意味这不能用独立主格结构

DUKB24

unlike Mike，with a flower at hand， he is more handsome  (Mike with a flower？or he？   不是特别好的例子。。不过足以说明）

so，which part do you think the with modifier should modify？


If you change the sentence


unlike Mike with a flower at hand，I am more handsome      （you don't have comma here）          so it is clear that Mike has the flower, not HE

a pair of comma set off the with modifier，you do not know which part it should attach ，so this structure creates ambiguity

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/8/27 18:34:03)

恩，你的例子我明白了，谢谢！！

-- by 会员 二楼往下掉 (2012/9/4 19:15:23)

在新prep1-190 对独立主格的解释中说
独立主格，表示伴随，所以必须修饰主谓宾结构，而非主系表结构

但在新prep1-232题中
The Acoma and Hopi are probably the two oldest surviving Pueblo
communities, both dating back at least a thousand years.

both dating
both of which have dated
and each has dated
and each one dating
E. each one of which date

答案是A。
并且解释中说  both dating 独立主格在此表示补充说明，与each型独立主格同一原理。
此句前面部分不是 主系表结构么？和prep1-190对独立主格的解释矛盾呀 ？

-- by 会员 默默楚 (2012/10/2 19:58:36)

有差么。。。


不是都是修饰preceding clause。。provide extra information么

默默楚

unlike Mike，with a flower at hand， he is more handsome  (Mike with a flower？or he？   不是特别好的例子。。不过足以说明）

so，which part do you think the with modifier should modify？


If you change the sentence


unlike Mike with a flower at hand，I am more handsome      （you don't have comma here）          so it is clear that Mike has the flower, not HE

a pair of comma set off the with modifier，you do not know which part it should attach ，so this structure creates ambiguity

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/8/27 18:34:03)

恩，你的例子我明白了，谢谢！！

-- by 会员 二楼往下掉 (2012/9/4 19:15:23)

在新prep1-190 对独立主格的解释中说
独立主格，表示伴随，所以必须修饰主谓宾结构，而非主系表结构

但在新prep1-232题中
The Acoma and Hopi are probably the two oldest surviving Pueblo
communities, both dating back at least a thousand years.

1. both dating
   
2. both of which have dated
   
3. and each has dated
   
4. and each one dating
   E. each one of which date
   
   答案是A。
   并且解释中说  both dating 独立主格在此表示补充说明，与each型独立主格同一原理。
   此句前面部分不是 主系表结构么？和prep1-190对独立主格的解释矛盾呀 ？
   

二楼往下掉

unlike Mike，with a flower at hand， he is more handsome  (Mike with a flower？or he？   不是特别好的例子。。不过足以说明）

so，which part do you think the with modifier should modify？


If you change the sentence


unlike Mike with a flower at hand，I am more handsome      （you don't have comma here）          so it is clear that Mike has the flower, not HE    

a pair of comma set off the with modifier，you do not know which part it should attach ，so this structure creates ambiguity

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/8/27 18:34:03)

恩，你的例子我明白了，谢谢！！