ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3160|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-SC67

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-12 03:06:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
暂时不讨论其他的问题,来看看这个句子的虚拟.....OG给的解释说 if x happened, then Y would happen....明显的对现在虚拟条件句...排除出题人故意的思路,本人怎么看这个句子怎么觉得用现在虚拟条件句有问题。首先是大环境在过去( first half of the...)  其次 明显的动词过去式 assumed. 怎么排也排不到现在..
按照虚拟的意思就是说实际上他们过去占有grip on Morocco, 如果不占有Morocco, 他们就怎么怎么样 这个应该是个明显的与过去不符的虚拟条件。如果是过去虚拟的话 那么是不是得用would have been. 个人的意见 欢迎拍砖
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-12 10:55:06 | 只看该作者
是啊  我知道啊  就是觉得这个地方用对现在的虚拟有疑问才提出这个问题....不知道它这里为什么要这么用
沙发
发表于 2011-6-12 10:38:51 | 只看该作者
如果是would have been的话,那么前面应该是if x had done吧。
所以不是would have been
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 14:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部