OG12th 26

guanwzy

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A)Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
(B)Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
(C)Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D)Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E)Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
答案是E，我想问一下，凭什么在这一题里我们可以改变原句的中心？

yukizz

谢谢二楼的亲~~~

guanwzy

噢。。。好像有点明白了，谢谢恩。。。

yuanjolly

for some reason, the original passage is not as clear as the E, A may have difficult comprehensing da outnumbering, which maybe parallel 2 the beginin and ending. whereas, to separate the clause, it means much clearer with no possible confusion

xyh133

我觉得首先ABCD选项都有致命性错误，相对只有E最好，
至于which 它是可以跳跃修饰的 Susan Huntington Dickinson 是人不能用which的 应该用who，所以which应该修饰的是letters

wenchang_yiy

我觉得这句话正常人都会这么说：E和C之间的通信数量超过了E与任何人的通信数量，这些信是开始于S结婚结束于E死亡
而原句本身就不是一个正常人的说话方式：E和C之间的通信时开始于S结婚结束于E死亡，超越了E与任何人的通信，改变原句重心在和逻辑结构错误比较的时候绝对不是一个大问题，就像我们都说Only和even不能随便改变位置这样的结论也有例外，那就是原句本身逻辑上就有问题

不过这里我倒有点不明白：which修饰letters还是Susan Huntington Dickinson，因为近在which之前的名词是SHD而不是letter，是否是因为引导词是which而不是who所以就可以跳跃引导SHD？