ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2489|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12th 26

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-9 20:28:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A)Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
(B)Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
(C)Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D)Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E)Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
答案是E,我想问一下,凭什么在这一题里我们可以改变原句的中心?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-12 12:30:26 | 只看该作者
我觉得这句话正常人都会这么说:E和C之间的通信数量超过了E与任何人的通信数量,这些信是开始于S结婚结束于E死亡
而原句本身就不是一个正常人的说话方式:E和C之间的通信时开始于S结婚结束于E死亡,超越了E与任何人的通信,改变原句重心在和逻辑结构错误比较的时候绝对不是一个大问题,就像我们都说Only和even不能随便改变位置这样的结论也有例外,那就是原句本身逻辑上就有问题

不过这里我倒有点不明白:which修饰letters还是Susan Huntington Dickinson,因为近在which之前的名词是SHD而不是letter,是否是因为引导词是which而不是who所以就可以跳跃引导SHD?
板凳
发表于 2010-7-12 16:18:55 | 只看该作者
我觉得首先ABCD选项都有致命性错误,相对只有E最好,
至于which 它是可以跳跃修饰的 Susan Huntington Dickinson 是人不能用which的 应该用who,所以which应该修饰的是letters
地板
发表于 2010-7-12 16:21:33 | 只看该作者
for some reason, the original passage is not as clear as the E, A may have difficult comprehensing da outnumbering, which maybe parallel 2 the beginin and ending. whereas, to separate the clause, it means much clearer with no possible confusion
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-13 12:26:09 | 只看该作者
噢。。。好像有点明白了,谢谢恩。。。
6#
发表于 2010-7-22 20:06:45 | 只看该作者
谢谢二楼的亲~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部