- UID
- 523005
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Just wanted to add a bit more...
When I was applying, I thought I had a great profile (760 gmat, 3.6+ gpa, GS/MS + REPE) and could just write some generic essays. But when I asked a friend who went to a top business school for feedback, the first thing he said was "yea your stats are fine, but finance people like you are also a dime a dozen. You are just bunch of number crunchers to the adcom...still need to find ways to stand out". I was a bit surprised, in an unpleasant way, but I definitely took that better than some people did here. A week before the deadline, I totally rewrote two of my essays that seemed too "stereotypical finance". For one of my essays, I ended up writing about an artistic pursuit and the lessons it taught me. And it worked. Could I have gotten in relying on just my stats and generic essays that talked about what a great analyst I am? I would never know, but I can say for certain that all those feedback helped me, not only in terms of putting together a better application, but also in terms of understanding my unique strengths and attributes.
Again, applicants from every industry (engineering, banking, consulting, whatever) face their own set of misconceptions and prejudice. The key is to understand what they are and how to demonstrate that you don't fit into the typical "box". That's all I have to say on this topic. Best of luck everyone! |
|