og13 19

loveeyore

A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg

A A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included
B The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
C Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, included
D Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are
E The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included
不是很能理解这里的比较 人和事件比较？ 求解释

loveeyore

引用小蛋糕狂魔的解释，解释的太棒了
2）比较的问题
我觉得这题的关键不在比较对象是否对应上
正确选项： The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.
把同位语插入成分 a pioneer journalist丢掉来看句子主干
The exploits of Nellie Bly included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.
红色是主语，粉色是谓语，蓝色是宾语
句子想说的是exploits包括什么，而后面黄色部分是作为modifier去修饰宾语的，to provide more information，所以重心不在于找比较的counterpart，把它当做一个修饰成分就好，如果非要扣的话，不妨把作为动名词的宾语 circling the globe改为宾语从句看：
The exploits of Nellie Bly included that  he circled the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg. (因为这里 globe 和 后面的人名不会造成歧意，所以省略了助动词 did）

http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-734750-3-1.html

loveeyore

Fiona09 发表于 2016-8-30 10:48
这题主要考查了同位语，"a pioneer journalist"作为同位语，就近修饰"Nellie Bly"，而"the exploits of  ...

谢谢呀，

Fiona09

这题主要考查了同位语，"a pioneer journalist"作为同位语，就近修饰"Nellie Bly"，而"the exploits of Nellie Bly"的核心词是"the exploits"，"of Nellie Bly"是来修饰了“The exploits”，而“The exploits”的谓语动词是“included”。

这句话的意思是：Nellie Bly，一个先锋记者的探险包括了比Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg更快地环游地球。

个人感觉这里并不是人和事件的比较，而是Nellie Bly环游探险的速度和Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg的环游速度的比较。