- UID
- 620943
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-4-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
板凳
楼主 |
发表于 2014-10-4 16:12:26
|
只看该作者
Studnents could receive a better, more efficient education if they spend 11 months a year studying. 不赞同。观点1:除了时间,有其他因素决定是否高效;2:study不是成功唯一途径;3时间不是越长越好。每次想观点都要好久。。。真是太不会忽悠了。。
Education is among the heated discussed topics and is always full of controversial argumetns. When it comes to whether the time spent by students should be increased, different people hold various views. Due to the crucial position of study in one’s life, some scholars hold the view that students should take the longer study time, say 11 months per year, the better. Rational seems the point of view, the logical chain behind it is readily to collapse. Several points in different dimensions will be illustrated to testify my argument.
Generally, the quality of students’ study is decided by a variety of elements, such as the quality of teachers, the merits of students, the time on study, etc. Determined by multiple factors, the effect on study will be complex and may change under various occasions if we alter one of the factors. Students can have more than one choices to improve their study such as utilizing the high-tech facilities in school, consulting with esteemed professors, etc. Same time on study, those who learn wisely accomplish more knowledge.
Moreover, the capability of study is no longer that important nowadays. How a person succeed has a totally indefinite definition. That is to say, we can achieve success via not only study but also other means. My friends have proved me that possibility. Both of my two friends, S & L, are very diligent and outstanding. S, chased after his father, started his apprentice life in his family factory after graduation; L, aimed at Nobel prize, continued his pursuit of science in college. Each of them now is chasing dream step by step, and one is leading a 10-staff team negotiating with clients while the other is working with his colleagues in the lab focusing on biotech. Hence studying is worth investing while other ways of living can also make success.
On the other hand, the statement has a total deficient loop that the longer studying the higher efficiency. Assuming that a student who performs excellent on his study has to spend more time on repeating the same thing for another two months a year, no wonder will he feel tired of study and may feel less penchant for knowledge. As a result, his efficiency will be lessened due to longer study time. Obviously this is the opposite consequence the statement wants to achieve.
Finally, I would like to emphasize that the time one spend on study does not equal to the quality of one’s learning process. Due to the factors I mentioned above, other indicators should be taken into consideration for the statement to be unbiased. |
|