求助GWD-8-Q17

crystalily · 发表于 2010-6-5 16:27:15

GWD-8-Q17:

Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

A.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D.having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E.having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have

答案是A,为什么D不对 having been beached 不是可以很好地修饰whale吗

A.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D.having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E.having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have

答案是A,为什么D不对 having been beached 不是可以很好地修饰whale吗

yawgamoth86 · 发表于 2010-6-5 23:02:48

having been done本来就是典型错误的用法而且你看 been beached是被动，后面又有by hominids 句子的意思就变成被人类搁浅

victorbj262 · 发表于 2010-6-5 23:53:41

having been 结构很啰嗦，完全可以省略掉。

crystalily · 发表于 2010-6-6 09:27:29

en 是啊 by homids 可以修饰前面的分句引起歧义正解谢谢

ybava018919 · 发表于 2010-6-6 09:50:20

句子中有a million years ago 这是一个用过去式的时间状语标志，这里是用过去式客观描述一个事实。楼上仁兄也说了having been done 是一个错误的句式，而且present perfect不能更客观的描述这个事实~

个人看法，

。加油↖(^ω^)↗

crystalily · 发表于 2010-6-6 10:10:35

是啊 a million ago都没注意到那就一定要用一般过去了~

ken178 · 发表于 2010-7-5 12:46:27

请问这种having been 结构如果出现是不是通常是错误的呢？陈向东的语法也是这么说的？
这题我把was看成修饰fossils，选错了。哎

hanlei8492 · 发表于 2010-9-28 21:27:40

了解句意还是很重要的，否则在主动和被动力纠结……

何倩倩 · 发表于 2011-11-22 22:20:03

可是这个句子的主语不是fossils吗，为什么之后并列的动词was butchered 的主语又变成了whale呢？求解~~

HarrisZheng · 发表于 2011-11-22 22:36:51

可是这个句子的主语不是fossils吗，为什么之后并列的动词was butchered 的主语又变成了whale呢？求解~~

-- by 会员何倩倩 (2011/11/22 22:20:03)

Fossils（主） of a whale（介词短语作定语修饰fossils） that（定语从句修饰whale，先行词that指代whale，在从句中做主语） beached（从句谓语） on an African shore more than a million years ago（从句状语） and was subsequently butchered（从句并列谓语） by hominids（从句第二谓语之宾语） have been recovered（主句谓语） by paleontologists（主句宾语）.

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E2-SC-224 | TN-06-SC-17 (AXIV)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

求助GWD-8-Q17

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()