OG13 SC 4小问题，跪求指教~~~~！！！不甚感激~

LowkeyWill · 发表于 2012-9-19 18:50:35

4. At the end of the 1930s, Duke Ellington was looking for a composer to assist him—someone not only who could arrange music for his successful big band, but mirroring his eccentric writing style as well in order to finishthe many pieces he had started but never completed.

(A) someone not only who could arrange music for his successful big band, but mirroring his eccentric writing style as well in order to finish

(B) someone who could not only arrange music for his successful big band, but also mirror his eccentric writing style in order to finish

(C) someone who not only could arrange music for his successful big band, but also to mirror his eccentric writing style in finishing

(D) that being someone who could not only arrange music for his successful big band, but mirroring his eccentric writing style for finishing

(E) being someone not only who could arrange music for his successful big band, but mirror his eccentric writing style as well, finishing

OG里对E的解释是的being的错误是Placingbeingin front ofsomeoneis potentially misleading; it could illogically refer to Ellington himself. 我很不明白为什么放在这会逻辑上的误指Ellington himself。前面有DASH是emphatic的作用，但是也不能解释refer to Ellington himself呀？。。不解

LowkeyWill · 发表于 2012-9-19 18:51:26

up。。。希望有人能回答下~~~

LowkeyWill · 发表于 2012-9-19 19:55:25

问题太低级了么。。。UP。。

alicezyk · 发表于 2012-9-19 20:17:21

我觉得是V-ING形式的逻辑主语是句子中的主语这里就是Duke Ellington

LowkeyWill · 发表于 2012-9-19 20:20:16

貌似成立~~~ 谢谢！~~~

sisichen666 · 发表于 2012-9-19 21:16:02

LZ破折号的用法：后面直接加你要表达的内容，不加什么修饰成分，所以being纯属多余，直接就加someone啦。。。。。。。

LowkeyWill · 发表于 2012-9-20 09:38:43

dash 的用法分几种。根据manhattan的说法，第一种情况The dash is a flexible punctuaton mark that the GMAT occasionally employs. You can use dash as an emphatice comma, semicolon, or colon. 第二种情况就是You can also use the dash to restate or explain an earlier part of the sentence. Unlike the colon, the dash does not need to be immediately preceded by the part needing explanation.但是木有准确说dash后面直接加解释的对象哦。。这里的being的错误我觉得还是v-ing形式作定语修饰了前面那句话的主语，逻辑上说不通。

sisichen666 · 发表于 2012-9-24 02:02:26

dash 的用法分几种。根据manhattan的说法，第一种情况The dash is a flexible punctuaton mark that the GMAT occasionally employs. You can use dash as an emphatice comma, semicolon, or colon. 第二种情况就是You can also use the dash to restate or explain an earlier part of the sentence. Unlike the colon, the dash does not need to be immediately preceded by the part needing explanation.但是木有准确说dash后面直接加解释的对象哦。。这里的being的错误我觉得还是v-ing形式作定语修饰了前面那句话的主语，逻辑上说不通。

-- by 会员 LowkeyWill (2012/9/20 9:38:43)

LZ。。。。。今天才看到这个帖子，，，，是我记错鸟。。。。囧囧囧。。。sorry啦，给看成冒号的用法了。。。囧囧囧。
对于E选项，其实是完整句子+破折号，那么后面就是对前句内容的的解释说明（用法2），单单看being someone，其实就是个being+n的罗嗦表达，而应该为直接加someone who做前句的同位语即可。

LowkeyWill · 发表于 2012-9-24 21:29:42

呵呵，木有事~~ 我也才看到。。。谢谢你哦~

颐昕诺 · 发表于 2012-9-27 00:03:34

我想说说我的看法。OG里对E的解释是的being的错误是Placingbeingin front ofsomeoneis potentially misleading; it could illogically refer to Ellington himself. 我很不明白为什么放在这会逻辑上的误指Ellington himself。

大致是三楼的那位的意思。
有的时候看BEING 还是DONE 这两类现在分词过去分词。句子太长都看不出主语意思逻辑是很正常的我觉得。记得高考的时候最简单的就是看见being 就说明动词和主语是主动关系。看见done 就和主语是被动关系。所以我觉得相同的道理，你看到 ING 形式跟在后面，外国人的逻辑就一定默认这是在继续描述或者形容主语，所以动作的发生发出者都和主语相关。所以 OG 的解释才会说逻辑上误导大家怎样怎样~~我的说法不一定在语法上可以和好的解释但起码会让你有语感，就是因为语感，所以我和楼主比，我怕看到这个解释就不会很疑惑~~哈哈希望你看懂我的叨叨了~~

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-672OG-2017-SC-672
OG-2016-SC-3
OG-2015-SC-4
OG-13-SC-4
... (SDMP)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG13 SC 4小问题，跪求指教~~~~！！！不甚感激~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-672OG-2017-SC-672OG-2016-SC-3OG-2015-SC-4OG-13-SC-4 ... (SDMP)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG13 SC 4小问题，跪求指教~~~~！！！不甚感激~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-672OG-2017-SC-672
OG-2016-SC-3
OG-2015-SC-4
OG-13-SC-4
... (SDMP)