ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9023|回复: 25
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助prep的两道题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-3 21:14:00 | 只看该作者

求助prep的两道题

The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million, which is part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer in the office color-printing market.

 

(A) million, which is part of a deal that will make

(B) million, a part of a deal that makes

(C) million, part of a deal making

(D) million as a part of a deal to make

(E) million as part of a deal that will make         选E

One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing the first significant change in the fuel efficiency of any class of passenger vehicle in almost two decades.

 

(A) amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing

(B) amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and it would represent

(C) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and it would represent

(D) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and would represent

(E) which is an increase amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, representing                  选D

两题形式差不多,考同位语用法,但是为什么上面一题语法笔记上说,同位语就近修饰million不行 但下面一题又可以用 an increase指代整件事呢? 恳请指教

 

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-3 21:18:00 | 只看该作者

还有一题类似的指代问题  答案E中who 不会指代了US吗?  因为我记得有一题语法笔记是用这样的指代错误杀掉的……

After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.

 

(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from

(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from

(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

 

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-3 23:46:00 | 只看该作者
大家帮帮小弟啊………… 急啊……
地板
发表于 2008-7-4 00:27:00 | 只看该作者
prep那題, D and E在意思上不同.
"to"一般都是表目的. 所以D有點怪...像說那個deal的目的是為了令到那buyer公司變成the largest manufacturer.
E在語意上比較合理 - 那個deal將會令到那buyer公司變成the largest manufacturer.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-4 21:36:00 | 只看该作者

那B呢 为什么不能用同位语呢?

6#
发表于 2008-7-5 00:16:00 | 只看该作者
B錯是因為這個purchase是在未來發生, 所以"make it the largest manufacturer in the office color-printing market"一定是在purchase之後, 所以一定要用未來式.
7#
发表于 2008-7-5 06:40:00 | 只看该作者
请高手继续!
8#
发表于 2008-7-5 13:00:00 | 只看该作者

同位语有几种结构;BY说的....

1. 名词性同位语. n.., n;     n,a/an +N, the, +n, n

$950 million, a part ( 根据NN 们的总结, 这样的同位语两个东东必须完全对等..)

  可是, LZ 反问一下自己,  a part 和 million 能对等吗? ..这里是不可以的..

我做的的时候也错啦.. 后来想想明白啦.

2. 概括性同位语, 用一个概括性的词去概括前面解释的对象: a program/information/an effort/ a practice  that.....

   an increase 在第二题中就可以概括性的说明前面的东东...所以, 可以用an increase

 

------关于,

(D) million as a part of a deal to make 

(E) million as part of a deal that will make        

D, E 我也想了半天...

    后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义..   原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make

   E 中却没有这个缺陷.

(D) million as a part of a deal to make 

(E) million as part of a deal that will make        

D, E 我也想了半天...

    后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义..   原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make

   E 中却没有这个缺陷.

9#
发表于 2008-7-5 13:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用maggiecookies在2008-7-5 13:00:00的发言:

同位语有几种结构;BY说的....

1. 名词性同位语. n.., n;     n,a/an +N, the, +n, n

$950 million, a part ( 根据NN 们的总结, 这样的同位语两个东东必须完全对等..)

  可是, LZ 反问一下自己,  a part 和 million 能对等吗? ..这里是不可以的..

我做的的时候也错啦.. 后来想想明白啦.

2. 概括性同位语, 用一个概括性的词去概括前面解释的对象: a program/information/an effort/ a practice  that.....

   an increase 在第二题中就可以概括性的说明前面的东东...所以, 可以用an increase

------关于,

(D) million as a part of a deal to make 

(E) million as part of a deal that will make        

D, E 我也想了半天...

    后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义..   原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make

   E 中却没有这个缺陷.

(D) million as a part of a deal to make 

(E) million as part of a deal that will make        

D, E 我也想了半天...

    后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义..   原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make

   E 中却没有这个缺陷.

(D) million as a part of a deal to make 

(E) million as part of a deal that will make        

D, E 我也想了半天...

    后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义..   原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make

   E 中却没有这个缺陷.

我觉得这里的a part of a deal不是第一种同位语却是第二种:就是指代前面整个公司的收购事件The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million是DEAL的一部分,这样的话B是不是就成立了?

请大家讨论!

10#
发表于 2008-7-6 00:34:00 | 只看该作者
xiado, 我讚同妳的看法.  可是B的時態不對. 看6樓.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 00:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部